Bunker Mulligan "Let us endeavor so to live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry." ~Mark Twain

March 1, 2004

Hacker Alert!

Filed under: Golf — Bunker @ 2:22 pm

This is a book I need to read: How to Line up Your 4th Putt by Bobby Rusher. Some tips to be gleaned from it are:

* achieve a flawless swing without injuring yourself or loved ones

* score well at night

* find a ball that everyone saw go into the water

* use profanity to maximize earnings on the golf course

* How to hit a Top Flite from the rough when you hit a Titleist from the tee

* How to avoid the water when you lie 8 in the bunker

* How to get more distance out of a shank

* Using your shadow on the greens to maximize earnings

* Proper etiquette when you are playing with a complete jerk

* Crying and how to handle it

* How to rationalize a 7 hour round

* How to make hitting short of the ladies tee look sexy

* How to let a foursome play through your twosome without getting embarrassed

* How to relax when you’re hitting five off the tee

* When to suggest swing corrections to your opponent

* God and the meaning of the double bogey

There will be a quiz.

See what I mean about rhetoric?

Filed under: Military — Bunker @ 11:26 am

In 1992 I was teaching future Air Force officers at USAFA. Just prior to graduation, I had an ethics class with seniors about to graduate, and one of them whined, “Can we talk about something other than the Honor Code? We’ve been beat over the head with it for four years!” I had already planned to do just that, so it was a great lead-in.

We were in the beginnings of a force reduction as a result of the demise of the Soviet Union, and an end to the Cold War. Some of the cadets were concerned about their future. So, I went into an explanation of the cycles of drawdown the military has seen.

In particular, I pointed out that the peak manpower had been in the late sixties and early seventies. There was a large reduction then, which bottomed out in the early eighties. It then climbed again, and in 1992 was about to drop once more. The only thing they needed to concern themselves with was whether they would retire as a lieutenant colonel or colonel in 20 years.

Bush 41 and Cheney (then, SecDef) had an organized plan for reduction. Clinton came in, and the plan went away in favor of expediency. Some of the reductions are listed here.

The interesting thing to me is that Clinton and Gore claimed they reduced the size of government. Well, I have to admit they did. They never explained how, did they?

Every agency in the Federal Government increased in manpower during their tenure except one: The Military. Their reduction in government manpower was completely on the back of the Pentagon.

And now they want credit for the quality of the military? I guess, indirectly, they are responsible. Military people are “can-do”, and took these reductions as a challenge. They rallied and built themselves, with no help from the White House, into what we now have. Guard and Reserve units shed those who were in just for the benefits, and recruited people who believed in the mission. Remember the crying that accompanied the call-ups in the first Gulf War? You heard little of that this time around.

Mrs. Clinton can get away with saying such things because the people who cheer her and her husband have very short memories, and are obsessed with their celebrity.

No, Clinton didn’t give us this military. Military personnel built it themselves from the pieces left over after the Clinton cuts.

As I think of the cycles, I wonder if we will again be in draw-down mode in 2012. Is that when we can expect this war on terror to be done. I think that timeline is just about right…unless someone other than Bush enters the White House next January. Even then, having Hillary there in 2009 may extend this war.

Crucifixion

Filed under: Society-Culture — Bunker @ 10:01 am

With interest in Mel Gibson’s movie, perhaps folks would like to know more about the medical explanation of death by crucifixion.

Stand clear if you value your life

Filed under: International — Bunker @ 9:25 am

Kim du Toit’s Weekly Rant is in regards to people comparing Bush to Hitler.

Economy

Filed under: Politics — Bunker @ 8:22 am

Neal Boortz has some good statistics you’ll never see except here:

* The peak unemployment rate during the recession that began in Clinton’s term was 6.4 percent. The current unemployment rate is 5.6 percent.

* In the last year more than 2,000,000 new jobs have been added in the United States.

* Between 1983 and 2003 outsourcing went from 6.5 million jobs to about 10 million jobs.

* Between 1983 and 2002 jobs in-sourcing — jobs coming TO the United States — went from 2.5 million to 6.5 million.

* If you subtract the jobs coming to the United States every year from the jobs going out every year you come up with a “net” figure. The net outsourced jobs reached its peak in the early 1980’s; a peak of about 4 million jobs. In other words, things were worse at the end of the Carter Administration then they are right now.

* During this same period … from ’83 to ’03 a total of 38 million jobs have been created by private businesses in the United States. No other industrialized country in the world has matched this number.

He also has an interesting Edwards campaign poster.

UPDATE: Power Line has yet another table comparing Bush’s first three years to Clinton’s. Interesting.

Why?

Filed under: Politics — Bunker @ 8:01 am

I have never understood the tie blacks have to the Democratic Party. Democrats wrote and enforced the Jim Crow laws in the South. Democrats in Massachusetts were some of the most racist people in the country back in the ’60s and ’70s (Kennedy and Kerry come to mind?). Our “first black President” Bill Clinton didn’t have a single one on his staff of policy advisors. Every program pushed by Democrats has done nothing but drive blacks as a group deeper into poverty and dependence.

“For black Democrats and white Democrats, their calculus is pretty much the same: They want to get rid of George W. Bush,” said David A. Bositis, senior political analyst at the Joint Center. “George W. Bush represents everything — war, violation of civil rights, tax cuts for the rich and program cuts for everybody else. There’s not one issue that really much matters; it’s the whole package.”

Rhetoric wins the day with Democrats. Neither logic nor knowledge are required. They cannot cite violations of civil rights, but it sounds ominous. Those terrible rich folks are keeping almost 30% of what they earn. Can anyone identify a single program cut? And WAR is always the first thing cited.

Republicans, on the other hand, have embraced blacks. You find many “people of color” holding office as Republicans. The only place you see that with Democrats is in congressional districts gerry-mandered to ensure a black majority. Of course, Bush has Rice and Powell. Neither is there as a token.

What makes a difference is that the Democrats don’t expect much of blacks. They just want their vote. Make no mistake, Republicans want those votes, too. But they aren’t willing to pander.

Trying to Grok

Filed under: Bunker's Favorites — Bunker @ 6:05 am

Sarah’s new site is up and running this morning. If you haven’t visited it before, do it now. She is in my “Big Minds” link list for a reason.

One of the great links she had today is here. Like all satire, the truth is what makes it funny.

« Newer Posts

Powered by WordPress