Bunker Mulligan "Let us endeavor so to live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry." ~Mark Twain

November 11, 2004

Maslow and Progressives

Filed under: International,Society-Culture — Bunker @ 5:44 pm

Now that the election is over and we simply await the final decision from the Electoral College, we have a group of people in this country who really don’t know what to do with themselves. Some are advocating secession, some want a group suicide, others want to move to Canada, and still others are posting their photographs on the internet with notes of apology to the rest of the world. And all of the above.

I think it all simply confirms my thoughts of last January where I talked about Maslow’s Heirarchy of Needs in relation to our national psyche. Rather than link back to that post, I wanted to bring it up to date and share it here once more.

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs is a basic building block for any elementary study of psychology. Maslow identified five stages in the psychological growth of any human being, Physiological Needs, Safety Needs, Love Needs, Esteem Needs, and Self-Actualization, which represent the full range from essentials to indulgence. Each state melds with the one above and below it so that there are variations with elements of another within each state.

Change from one state to a higher one is considered to be “success.” Change in the downward direction is bad because it requires a re-focus on survival skills rather than indulgence. So, change can be good, but change can also be bad.

Homeostasis is the nature of ecological, biological, and social systems to oppose change with every means at their disposal. According to the Principia Cybernetica Web:

Homeostasis is one of the most remarkable and most typical properties of highly complex open systems. A homeostatic system (an industrial firm, a large organization, a cell) is an open system that maintains its structure and functions by means of a multiplicity of dynamic equilibriums rigorously controlled by interdependent regulation mechanisms. Such a system reacts to every change in the environment, or to every random disturbance, through a series of modifications of equal size and opposite direction to those that created the disturbance. The goal of these modifications is to maintain the internal balances.

So, change is not good. Change is bad.

Maslow was interested in individuals, and his concepts are meant to apply to individuals. The concept of homeostasis developed by physiologist Walter Cannon was also intended, originally, to apply to individual organisms. Both do have value in looking at group activity on both the micro (individual) and macro (group) level.

According to Maslow, the base state is the need to satisfy physiological needs:food, air, water, sleep. These are all requirements for survival of the individual, and other needs will not even be in consideration unless these are met. In the US, these needs are met for all who want them. Nobody goes unfed or unsheltered unless they so choose. Children in this country are not hungry unless their parents decide they need to be. The safety net is in place and functional.

The second level in Maslow’s structure is safety. One cannot progress without a sense of security. In day-to-day living, the vast majority of Americans give no thought to this. Some in this country cannot progress beyond this state, in spite of having achieved some elements of the higher states. They are tied to it pychologically or live in an environment where they must constantly check six.

The third level is love, or bonding, or belonging. It includes personal one-on-one relationships as well as group identity. This and the next level are where the majority of Americans stay, and want to be. It is the level socialism seeks for us all.

That next level is esteem. This includes self-esteem, which is where, we are told, society wants us all to be. It is the desire for adulation at one extreme, and the sense of being respected by another.

Finally, the highest state of being in Maslow’s world is self-actualization. At this level, all your baser needs are met, and you are free to indulge yourself. You can become everything you ever wanted to be. You can do anything you ever wanted to do. It is the essence of capitalism.

In the United States, we have collectively lived in the level 3 (Love Needs) to level 4 (Esteem Needs) range (let’s call it Level 3.5) for the last forty years. Individually, we would all like to achieve self-actualization. Yet we know that stage is nearly impossible to reach as a group because there are always those content to stay at the lower levels. So we content ourselves with being at the “belonging” stage culturally. It is comfortable. It is why we have interest groups, and the hated “special-interest groups.” The only difference being that any group we belong to isn’t one of those. Every disease or human failing has a support group we can join. We certainly desire adulation, and bestow it on some in substitution for respect. We certainly want respect ourselves. Culturally, though, adulation is more important.

These statics became dynamics on September 11, 2001. As a nation, we fell from Level 3.5 to Level 2. Homeostasis was strong, and now we are trying to regain our balance.

There is a very angry group which wants a quick return to “belonging.” Getting to “esteem” isn’t even in their viewfinder. They want to belong to the world, belong to the UN, belong to one another. They just want to belong, and don’t really care whom they belong with. This drove the Kerry campaign.

There are those who want to again reach the esteem level and higher. They aren’t interested in adulation, but do want respect. The rest of the world had lost its respect for the US. They are now beginning to understand that is a bad thing.

Honoring someone with respect is not the same as demeaning oneself. Equals respect one another. But if you live in the world of “belonging,” respect is higher. From your perspective, you are ceding status. Those who live in the levels below this don’t want to offer respect because they view it as adulation.

This is the crux of the far left’s hatred of George Bush. They know what our country has accomplished in the last three years. They know we have once again climbed up from the security level. They know they would be happy reaching a state of belonging. But they know he wants us to go to the level of respect–respect from the outside, and self-respect. I believe some actually respect him, but can’t express it for fear of being accused by their group of adoring him.

With a choice of showing some kind of respect–which could be interpreted by their peers as adulation–and regarding him (and those of us who supported him) as an imbecile, they find it much easier to select the latter. It keeps them cozy with their group who have the same feelings.

This election was one of the most important in years. The choice was between adopting the world community’s socialistic culture completely, or insisting on achiving the higher state of respect and preventing another decline into the security level.

The “Progressives” who supported Kerry and are now totally distraught live in the world of Maslow’s Love Needs. Progress is nowhere in their plan. Now that they feel we have the Safety Needs taken care of, they want to live in a country which is loved by all the others, and is presided over by a man loved by all the foreign leaders and folks like Kofi Annan. They have no desire to go beyond that level, and their personal homeostasis wants everyone else to quit trying to get there. In their minds, anything above Love Needs on a national level is what caused the attacks on 9/11 in the first place.

In some ways, they are right about that. The people who attacked us have the same mentality as our friends who are depressed: Honoring someone with respect is the same as demeaning oneself. Respecting the US is not allowed.

Folks who voted for Bush recognize we need to get through the Esteem/Respect Needs phase for us to achieve self-actualization. And it can be a painful ride. But it is the only route for us to achieve all those wonderful social changes the progressives say they want. Fake or forced love just don’t cut it.

So, chill. And join us. Don’t leave, and don’t even think about suicide. Together the people of this country have the knowledge, talent, and drive not seen anywhere else. We can get there.

6 Comments

  1. Brilliant and sublime.

    Taking stock and looking in the mirror is just about the most noble thing we can do, as Americans of all political stripes.

    Too expressive, perhaps? Not on this Day of Rememberance.

    Comment by Alex — November 11, 2004 @ 6:25 pm

  2. Minor nitpick: in the paragraph quoted below, do you really mean former, or do you mean latter? Because I really thought you meant that they choose to regard him as an imbecile because that makes it easier to belong …

    Other than that, I’m still chewing the essay over. Good food for thought. Thank you.

    With a choice of showing some kind of respect–which could be interpreted by their peers as adulation–and regarding him (and those of us who supported him) as an imbecile, they find it much easier to select the former. It keeps them cozy with their group who have the same feelings.

    Comment by Eowyn — November 11, 2004 @ 6:38 pm

  3. Thanks for catching the error. You are absolutely right in what I intended to say. Even after you pointed it out, I had to read it twice to be sure!

    Comment by Bunker — November 11, 2004 @ 6:41 pm

  4. I thought Maslow was discredited?

    But what do I know? I’m a Freudian!

    Comment by Paulie at The Commons — November 11, 2004 @ 7:06 pm

  5. Freudian? Isn’t that somewhere in France?! Funny, you don’t look French.

    Comment by Bunker — November 12, 2004 @ 5:27 am

  6. Well done. Thanks!

    Comment by Pat in NC — November 12, 2004 @ 10:20 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress