Bunker Mulligan "Let us endeavor so to live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry." ~Mark Twain

December 13, 2004

Odd, isn’t it?

Filed under: General — Bunker @ 8:06 am

After reading one of those well-crafted comments, where the writer displays a complete mastery of the English language while making cogent points about the illegitimacy of the war in Iraq, I had to make a not-so-astute observation.

For the last three years we have been involved in conflict with Islamofascists. During that time, a clear divide has exposed itself between those who support the war and the young men and women fighting it, and those who opposed the conflict and claim to support the troops. A big clue for that group: It is impossible to support the troops without supporting what they are doing.

Isn’t it odd that those who oppose the fighting, in general, are unaffected by it. Those who support it, again in general, are ones with a personal stake in the outcome.

The loudest opposition comes from those who are not only not involved, but don’t even know anyone who is. Not just that, but they don’t want to know anyone involved.

Sarah has done a little research on the subject, and the results didn’t surprise me a bit.

Martial Law

Filed under: International — Bunker @ 8:05 am

Arthur Chrenkoff finished second in the Weblogs Awards. It isn’t because he’s any less than Tim Blair–just newer to the blogosphere.

Something often lacking in the blogosphere is first-hand reporting. That isn’t the case today:

I was nine and a half. I remember it snowed when I woke up on Sunday morning. I got up and went to switch on TV to watch “Teleranek” (TV Morning), a weekly program for kids that always aired at 9am. But there was only snow on the screen, too. We didn’t know what has happened, but the phone lines were cut off as well, and that was a bad sign. The streets were eerily empty, as if every family in every apartment around, faced with the same snow on TV and the same dead signal on the phone, was also drawing into themselves and waiting for somebody else to make the first move.

December 12, 2004

Comm Monitoring of IAEA

Filed under: International — Bunker @ 10:14 am

Dafna Linzer has a good piece on the communications intercepts between Mohamed ElBaradei and Iranians.

The Bush administration has dozens of intercepts of Mohamed ElBaradei’s phone calls with Iranian diplomats and is scrutinizing them in search of ammunition to oust him as director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, according to three U.S. government officials.

The Washington Post concludes that the goal of all this is to oust ElBaradei from his position as head of the IAEA. Perhaps there is some truth to that. There is a rule that restricts UN functionaries from more than two terms, but that is often ignored. ElBaradei wants to stay on, and I really don’t blame him. He makes a huge salary and is able to live in New York City and Geneva. If forced to leave, he might have to return home to Egypt.

I think it is also just as likely that we are monitoring his communications for far more important information than that. Since Iranians are emphatic in their pursuit of nuclear technology, we need to have as much information as possible. Funny, you’ll not see mention of that issue anywhere in the article.

Don’t break your arm

Filed under: Media — Bunker @ 9:18 am

Ed Driscoll and Glenn Reynolds have done one of the back-and-forth link routines we often see on the topic of blog readership.

In particular, they are talking about the number of blogs passing a couple of numerical milestones. The comparison of numbers goes on to compare those numbers to the readership of mainstream newspapers, and viewership of the news networks. One comparison caught my eye:

CNN’s typically daily viewership is only about 450,000 viewers. (The Fox News Channel, the cable news ratings leader, gets an average of 799,000 viewers during their broadcasting day.)

Somehow those numbers seem very low, but I’m sure there is some mathematics to back them up somewhere.

My concern is that there are far too many people in the blogosphere patting themselves on the back. The blogosphere is dynamic, and that is what makes it different from those other outlets. Yet it is a short step from that to muddled thought.

What form could the blogosphere eventually take? When you rest on your laurels you end up with what we see in Hollywood and newsrooms. Where are the Jimmy Stewarts and Clark Gables who could get in uniform to support the country? These are the folks who deride Pat Tillman–don’t look for any there. How about Newspapers? Maureen Dowd is still employed at The New York Times, is she not? And television gives us arrogance in the form of Dan Rather and Bill O’Reilly. All are folks who believe they have the truth, and you must agree with them or you are somehow defective in cognitive ability.

That is not something they set out to become. They began by having a vision of providing entertainment, or explaining events with clarity so that their viewers and readers didn’t have to sift through the garbage to draw valid conclusions. But they became the gatekeepers for what was and wasn’t garbage, probably without ever realizing it.

Beware success. It can drive you to believe you alone have all the answers. One of the things I loved about the military was the ethos that didn’t allow this to happen very often. For all the complaints being aired about the National Guard specialist asking Rumsfeld about armor, there is some history that keeps this kind of dialog alive there. Military bosses are not above reproach, and know it. Awards are given, and just as quickly forgotten. Past performance is not the standard of evaluation–potential is. Receive a Navy Cross, and you’re soon just another sailor or Marine. Win an Oscar, and your future is established for a lifetime.

The Weblog Awards, conceived as a way to recognize folks who have provided excellent content and thought while exposing some to blogs they’ve not seen before have potential for becoming Oscaresque if we aren’t careful. Today is the last day of voting, and there will be a huge push from some bloggers for your vote. Remember, we shouldn’t be patting ourselves on the back. We need to follow the path of military professional rather than that of our betters in Hollywood.

December 11, 2004

Christmas Decorations

Filed under: General — Bunker @ 6:57 pm

I really like Christmas. All my neighbors do, too:

neighbor

However, I’m far more creative than any of them. I don’t believe in following fixed edges, or filling trees with artificial light–far too simple. I prefer the more artistic approach, using the world as my canvas and lights as my pallette.

ours

The neighbors think I’m a crazy old loon. I report–you decide.

December 10, 2004

2004 Weblog Awards Best Online Community

Filed under: General — Bunker @ 6:15 pm

I’m not much for things like this, but I have to wonder why things are going this way.

Kevin, at Wizbang, put this whole thing together, and put in a lot of effort. There are always people who can’t deal with losing, and we know who they are. A commenter at Daily Kos posted a script which would allow visitors to that site to flood the awards voting (probably the same jerks that spam blogs) for the left-wing sites. Kevin had to go back and delete the spam votes, and put in some protection. Is this stuff that important?

Not to me. But I think my group should be doing a little better than we are. I don’t even recognize the names of the other blog communities except Munuvia. We’ve got Doug and his new advance in blogging (Homespun Radio), Chris, Marvin, Paulie and the gang, Alex, a host of others who are very good, and (of course) Arthur–our most famous member.

Go to the site, vote for us if so inclined, and check out the others while you’re there. You will probably find something far better than you read here.

But check my friends’ sites–they are definitely worth a look.

Homecoming

Filed under: General — Bunker @ 1:38 pm

In a few minutes I get to go out to CRP and pick up Sweetie Pie Girl. She’s at DFW right now, so I guess her Texas passport was still good to get her out of LAX. I only get to see her for an extended weekend, and it’s been almost three years since she’s been home. That’s about the equivalent of a one-year tour in Afghanistan from what I’ve seen of LA.

#2 Son and his bride will also be here for a couple of days. He has time off after his “incident” and before visiting the shrink next week to be sure he’s mentally sound enough to deal with the low-lifes on the street.

Man, what stories will be told this weekend!

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress