Bunker Mulligan "Let us endeavor so to live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry." ~Mark Twain

November 12, 2004

Deaniacs

Filed under: Politics — Bunker @ 1:49 pm

I’ve missed something until now. And most others have missed it, too. So I don’t feel too badly. All the whining and crying isn’t coming from Kerry supporters. Those who are seeking therapy aren’t people who went into this election with Kerry as their man.

They are Deaniacs. Their man lost in Iowa much earlier this year. They latched on to Kerry as a stand-in. After all the weeping for Howard Dean, they put their hopes in someone they had no real faith in–and he lost. That is why they are so hurt. They are double losers.

They are the ones crying for secession. And they are the ones whining that the blue states pay out more in federal taxes and receive less in return.

Let’s think about that last bit for a second. The blue states are the ones who advocate higher taxes, because they are the ones who want increased government spending and involvement in our lives (except for Defense, of course). Isn’t the fact this imbalance exists a boon to their philosophy? Aren’t they pleased?

And, if you will bear with me, who pays the taxes in this country? The top 5% income earners pay over 50%. A little logic will show that if all those things are true, the Democratic Party is the party of the rich. With all the wealth focused in NYC, Boston, LA, SF, and Seattle, it seems to me that it only makes sense.

November 11, 2004

Maslow and Progressives

Filed under: International,Society-Culture — Bunker @ 5:44 pm

Now that the election is over and we simply await the final decision from the Electoral College, we have a group of people in this country who really don’t know what to do with themselves. Some are advocating secession, some want a group suicide, others want to move to Canada, and still others are posting their photographs on the internet with notes of apology to the rest of the world. And all of the above.

I think it all simply confirms my thoughts of last January where I talked about Maslow’s Heirarchy of Needs in relation to our national psyche. Rather than link back to that post, I wanted to bring it up to date and share it here once more.

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs is a basic building block for any elementary study of psychology. Maslow identified five stages in the psychological growth of any human being, Physiological Needs, Safety Needs, Love Needs, Esteem Needs, and Self-Actualization, which represent the full range from essentials to indulgence. Each state melds with the one above and below it so that there are variations with elements of another within each state.

Change from one state to a higher one is considered to be “success.” Change in the downward direction is bad because it requires a re-focus on survival skills rather than indulgence. So, change can be good, but change can also be bad.

Homeostasis is the nature of ecological, biological, and social systems to oppose change with every means at their disposal. According to the Principia Cybernetica Web:

Homeostasis is one of the most remarkable and most typical properties of highly complex open systems. A homeostatic system (an industrial firm, a large organization, a cell) is an open system that maintains its structure and functions by means of a multiplicity of dynamic equilibriums rigorously controlled by interdependent regulation mechanisms. Such a system reacts to every change in the environment, or to every random disturbance, through a series of modifications of equal size and opposite direction to those that created the disturbance. The goal of these modifications is to maintain the internal balances.

So, change is not good. Change is bad.

Maslow was interested in individuals, and his concepts are meant to apply to individuals. The concept of homeostasis developed by physiologist Walter Cannon was also intended, originally, to apply to individual organisms. Both do have value in looking at group activity on both the micro (individual) and macro (group) level.

According to Maslow, the base state is the need to satisfy physiological needs:food, air, water, sleep. These are all requirements for survival of the individual, and other needs will not even be in consideration unless these are met. In the US, these needs are met for all who want them. Nobody goes unfed or unsheltered unless they so choose. Children in this country are not hungry unless their parents decide they need to be. The safety net is in place and functional.

The second level in Maslow’s structure is safety. One cannot progress without a sense of security. In day-to-day living, the vast majority of Americans give no thought to this. Some in this country cannot progress beyond this state, in spite of having achieved some elements of the higher states. They are tied to it pychologically or live in an environment where they must constantly check six.

The third level is love, or bonding, or belonging. It includes personal one-on-one relationships as well as group identity. This and the next level are where the majority of Americans stay, and want to be. It is the level socialism seeks for us all.

That next level is esteem. This includes self-esteem, which is where, we are told, society wants us all to be. It is the desire for adulation at one extreme, and the sense of being respected by another.

Finally, the highest state of being in Maslow’s world is self-actualization. At this level, all your baser needs are met, and you are free to indulge yourself. You can become everything you ever wanted to be. You can do anything you ever wanted to do. It is the essence of capitalism.

In the United States, we have collectively lived in the level 3 (Love Needs) to level 4 (Esteem Needs) range (let’s call it Level 3.5) for the last forty years. Individually, we would all like to achieve self-actualization. Yet we know that stage is nearly impossible to reach as a group because there are always those content to stay at the lower levels. So we content ourselves with being at the “belonging” stage culturally. It is comfortable. It is why we have interest groups, and the hated “special-interest groups.” The only difference being that any group we belong to isn’t one of those. Every disease or human failing has a support group we can join. We certainly desire adulation, and bestow it on some in substitution for respect. We certainly want respect ourselves. Culturally, though, adulation is more important.

These statics became dynamics on September 11, 2001. As a nation, we fell from Level 3.5 to Level 2. Homeostasis was strong, and now we are trying to regain our balance.

There is a very angry group which wants a quick return to “belonging.” Getting to “esteem” isn’t even in their viewfinder. They want to belong to the world, belong to the UN, belong to one another. They just want to belong, and don’t really care whom they belong with. This drove the Kerry campaign.

There are those who want to again reach the esteem level and higher. They aren’t interested in adulation, but do want respect. The rest of the world had lost its respect for the US. They are now beginning to understand that is a bad thing.

Honoring someone with respect is not the same as demeaning oneself. Equals respect one another. But if you live in the world of “belonging,” respect is higher. From your perspective, you are ceding status. Those who live in the levels below this don’t want to offer respect because they view it as adulation.

This is the crux of the far left’s hatred of George Bush. They know what our country has accomplished in the last three years. They know we have once again climbed up from the security level. They know they would be happy reaching a state of belonging. But they know he wants us to go to the level of respect–respect from the outside, and self-respect. I believe some actually respect him, but can’t express it for fear of being accused by their group of adoring him.

With a choice of showing some kind of respect–which could be interpreted by their peers as adulation–and regarding him (and those of us who supported him) as an imbecile, they find it much easier to select the latter. It keeps them cozy with their group who have the same feelings.

This election was one of the most important in years. The choice was between adopting the world community’s socialistic culture completely, or insisting on achiving the higher state of respect and preventing another decline into the security level.

The “Progressives” who supported Kerry and are now totally distraught live in the world of Maslow’s Love Needs. Progress is nowhere in their plan. Now that they feel we have the Safety Needs taken care of, they want to live in a country which is loved by all the others, and is presided over by a man loved by all the foreign leaders and folks like Kofi Annan. They have no desire to go beyond that level, and their personal homeostasis wants everyone else to quit trying to get there. In their minds, anything above Love Needs on a national level is what caused the attacks on 9/11 in the first place.

In some ways, they are right about that. The people who attacked us have the same mentality as our friends who are depressed: Honoring someone with respect is the same as demeaning oneself. Respecting the US is not allowed.

Folks who voted for Bush recognize we need to get through the Esteem/Respect Needs phase for us to achieve self-actualization. And it can be a painful ride. But it is the only route for us to achieve all those wonderful social changes the progressives say they want. Fake or forced love just don’t cut it.

So, chill. And join us. Don’t leave, and don’t even think about suicide. Together the people of this country have the knowledge, talent, and drive not seen anywhere else. We can get there.

Joshua Michael Palmer

Filed under: International,Military — Bunker @ 4:50 pm

Hugh Hewitt was broadcasting his show from San Diego State, the alma mater of 1LT Parker. Joshua was killed in Fallujah last spring. He is the type of man we have doing the job throughout Iraq.

He was so proud to go to Iraq. The same as when he had vowed to help the Mexican children, and the Chinese children, he felt that he could now help the Iraqi children. The week before Josh was killed, he had requested special permission to stay another year in Iraq. He didn’t want to leave until the work was done. He loved the kids there. He wrote home, asking for candy and toys, because he loved giving it to the kids and watching them smile. Every night, he ate dinner with Iraqi families. He loved them, and they loved him. He believed in what we are doing there. He told my cousin Laura that he wanted these children to have the chance to grow up with democracy, the way he did, so that they would have an honest chance of making their lives better.

On this Veterans’ Day, I would love to see his name splashed all over the blogosphere. He never won a Nobel Peace Prize, but did far more for peace than the thug who dies yesterday and will be memorialized through the weekend.

Go read the full memorial for Joshua over at Hugh’s site. If you agree with me that Joshua and his comrades in this war are far more deserving, let’s see if we can get his name at the top of a google search or two.

Veterans’ Day

Filed under: General — Bunker @ 10:56 am

I had the day off so I went into the studio for Jim’s Show this morning. It was an interesting experience. I haven’t been inside a radio station in many years, and all the tape machines for playing music intros and commercials have been replaced by computers. Will Diaz handles all those things:

Will (42K)

Jim stays busy during the whole show. When he isn’t actively involved on air, he his scanning his notes and the morning paper while surfing the net.

Lago (39K)

For my part, it was more difficult. I normally sit in front of my computer and call in to the show, and am better able to follow Jim’s train of thought because I can have his site on-screen, and move to different links he or I have found in the blogosphere to discuss what’s going on. Once some of the regulars came into the studio, things got a bit easier. My own cardiologist, Dr. Greg Silverman, is one of them, and he was a bit surprised to see me there. But from that point on, we had more conversation rather than broadcast.

I have to say that a talk radio host is quite organized, and always thinking. Jim has a notebook with text for ads, which he embellishes as the feeling hits him. He has his notes which he prepares all through the day, and augments as he airs. I’m impressed.

One topic of the day was Arafat. The local paper’s headline calls him a “Terrorist, Statesman, Peacemaker”. The first is accurate, but neither of the other two are words I would ever use to describe him.

And Jim posted a Kipling poem on his site which should be mandatory reading. Go there and read it.

And Happy Veterans’ Day to all my fellow vets out there. Thank you for your service in peace and war.

November 10, 2004

Illegal Immigation

Filed under: Government,International — Bunker @ 5:37 pm

We now know the deal Dubya cut with McCain to get his support in the election–Amnesty for illegal immigrants. This is not something Bush voters saw as a mandate, I can assure you. And it is not something I’m pleased about.

There are many reasons for both parties to want the flow of Mexicans into this country to continue. I just don’t know precisely why McCain is so interested. He has some kind of dealings with people who want the status quo. The average Arizonan doesn’t. Republicans really have nowhere near as much interest in having more here as do Democrats. There is the cheap labor aspect of things, which Democrats will tout as the primary reason for this move. But Democratic supporters are just as likely to hire them as Republican supporters. Tyson Foods, one of the biggest Clinton donors, is heavily into the illegal market.

And Democrats have always viewed Mexicans in the US as a prime voting block that historically goes to them. Bush made inroads into that group in his reelection as Governor, and now as President. But it certainly wasn’t enough to have a significant impact (regardless of Dick Morris’ evaluation).

There is something far deeper going on here. We send over a billion dollars to Mexico each year in aid. In return, they send us half a million immigrants, both legal and illegal. Mexicans account for the largest group of legal immigrants coming into the US each year, as well as the largest group of illegals.

Mexico is poor–40% of the population live in poverty. The society is very class-conscious, and moving from one class to another is nearly impossible. It has retained much of the caste system that existed from colonial times. Corruption is the byword in politics. The poor really have no hope except escape. And it is a really painful thing to see. It is difficult to imagine the risks taken by people desperate to do better for themselves.

The northern border is a political relief valve. Without the oppotunity for people to escape to something better, and money from those working in the US being sent home, the political system in Mexico would implode.

There is something very secretive in this mix. In issues regarding national defense, I defer to a President’s judgement of how much information can be released. In this case, there isn’t nearly enough.

What the heck…

Filed under: General — Bunker @ 1:25 pm

I was going to wait until tomorrow, Veterans’ Day, to break out the background. But since the Marines are having a birthday party I’d thought it would be appropriate for today.

“It is the soldier, not the reporter,
Who has given us freedom of the press.

“It is the soldier, not the poet,
Who has given us freedom of speech.

“It is the soldier, not the campus organizer,
Who has given us the freedom to demonstrate.

“It is the soldier, who salutes the flag,
Who serves beneath the flag,
And whose coffin is draped by the flag,
Who allows the protester to burn the flag.”

— Father Dennis Edward O’Brian, USMC

Gimmees

Filed under: Golf — Bunker @ 11:28 am

“Halved hole,” says the foe; but “No,” I say, “No”;

“Putt it out, mine enemie!

You’re dead but not buried.”

He’s shaky and flurried!

Oh! a terrible miss makes he.

Bernard Darwin describes the 12-inch putt that sends shivers down the spine. The one to win the hole, or the match.

I learned my lesson years ago, although I sometimes still fall prey to the natural instinct to avoid failure when someone concedes a putt to me. Once conceded, a putt is made–no declining. But I normally will still finish out unless pressed by the group behind (a tale for another day).

In a match play tournament several years ago I was pitted against an amiable man who had once lived in Lexington, Kentucky. So had I. He played basketball for UK many years before, but returned for at least one game each year. We talked about Lexington and the nice courses the city owns. But on this day, we were opponents.

At the turn, I was already dormie. He had a terrible front nine and was on the verge of simply returning to the clubhouse. I didn’t want to lose my playing partner for the day, as we had always enjoyed one another’s company on the course. I tried to encourage him, and he won the tenth hole. And the eleventh. And the twelfth.

Now I was getting a little frustrated! I tried to bear down and focus, but had already lost that mental edge. And his was returning. We approached the eighteeth hole with me still one up.

All I needed was to tie the hole to win the match. He finished out, and I had a long putt to win the hole. I left it 18 inches wide of the cup. I half expected him to say, “Pick it up,” and congratulate me on winning the match. He didn’t. I almost walked up and simply tapped it in, but chose to “be careful” instead. I stood over the ball, stroked the putt, and it lipped out. On to another hole. And another, which he won to take the match.

Since then, I finish every putt. Well, not always. When I’m with a group I don’t know well, I follow their lead.

It’s a life lesson, as well. How many times do we take the gimme without thought, then quiver at the simplest of tasks we’ve not been required to do for some time? We’ve lost the confidence that comes from dealing with those little things daily, and tense up when that little thing must be done.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress