John Adams asks whether he is, in fact, homophobic. He really assesses the topic much as I would, and concludes that maybe he is.
While I have pondered this question, and would like to believe that I am not, I have come to the realization that the answer, to some extent, is probably yes. I don’t hate homosexuals, and one of my best friends in the world is gay. I do not believe people should discriminate against homosexuals, although I see no need to elevate them to a consitutionally protected class.
I don’t quite agree. A phobia is an unreasonable fear. I personally don’t fear homosexuals. Like Adams, I’ve had several friends who were. And enjoyed their company as much as I did the company of others. But the term has been hijacked to describe anyone who does not completely concur with the lifestyle. In that light, I am homophobic as well.
So what? I believe in individuality. If they desire to live their lives in that fashion, who am I to complain that it doesn’t fit my own lifestyle?
Several years ago the big issue was gays in the military and “Don’t ask, don’t tell.” To me, that was really stupid. It had always been “don’t ask, don’t tell” during my time in the military. And there were several men, and women, I suspected of being homosexual. But it was irrelevant. What the military doesn’t need, on the other hand, is open sexuality, whether it be homosexual or heterosexual. Madonna would not be an asset, either.
As a final thought, Adams speaks of a charity request from the cast at the end of a Broadway show he’d seen:
Apparently, the group raises money to buy daily necessities for AIDS patients, such as food, medicine, and rent money. (Wouldn’t it be nice if the Susan Sarandons and Barbra Streisands of the entertainment industry would lend their star power to such worthy endeavors?)
Once again, how can you argue with that?