Bunker Mulligan "Let us endeavor so to live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry." ~Mark Twain

March 30, 2004

Starvation by Choice?

Filed under: International — Bunker @ 12:23 pm

Millions in Angola are dying for lack of food. So what does the UN World Food Program do? See for yourself.

Liberal War

Filed under: International — Bunker @ 11:43 am

James has a really good Post which has links to a couple of other very good related posts at Winds of Change and Belmont. As a collection, they cover just about every argument regarding the link between terrorism and Marxism as they relate to the same desired outcome.

Iraq link

Filed under: International — Bunker @ 11:34 am

Were Iraq and al-Qaeda linked? Richard Clarke used to think so, as Christopher Hitchens points out in Slate.

He also points out that Clarke was considered a royal pain in the ass in the Clinton White House, although he was generally right. Which makes his pain-in-the-assedness even worse.

If Teddy drove a VW…

Filed under: Politics — Bunker @ 10:28 am

Remember these Volkswagen ads?

If Ted Kennedy had driven a VW when he was younger, he would have been President, and wouldn’t now be trying to get Kerry elected.

Sandbaggers

Filed under: Bunker's Favorites,Golf — Bunker @ 9:57 am

A friend of mine was complaining yesterday about a tournament where a young guy with a 15 handicap scored a 73 during a tournament. For those of you unfamiliar with golf handicaps, the typical par for 18 holes (not always, depends on the course) is 72. For someone with a 15 handicap, his net score for that round would be 58. This is pretty unlikely, although certainly not beyond the realm of possibility. At one time, I had scores posted for handicap that ranged from 78 to 108 during a two-month period. Inconsistent swings, especially during significant changes, can cause big deviations in scoring.

But a handicap is based on the best ten scores out of your twenty most recent. And then, only 96% of their average gives you an Index. So, in the case of my broad range (and I don?t have all those scores to look at right now), my ten best were probably in the 78 to 93 range. An average of these would have been somewhere around 86. That would have given me a 13 handicap, more or less. So, on my best day, when I shot a 78, my net score would have been 65. Pretty good! Of course, I would be just as likely to shoot 108, for a net 95?not so good.

According to research by the USGA, the odds against my shooting another 78 is 552 to 1. For that young man with a 15 handicap to score a 73, the odds go off the chart. The USGA didn?t even bother to calculate that high. They stop at 10 under par net (he was at 14 under), and those odds are 37,000 to 1. His odds (doing a little curve fitting and extrapolation) come to about 3 million to one. Certainly less than winning the lottery, and definitely possible. But unlikely.

Personally, I think this guy is a cheater. He falls into the one to two percent of golfers who pad their handicap by only posting their worst scores. And there is only one reason to do this, and that is to gain an unfair advantage in handicapped competition.

Golf has always had the distinction of being a gentleman?s game. You must know and obey the rules. There are no referees. You must call your own penalties. You keep your own score, and sign for that score at the end of your round. It is all about integrity. I think that, more than anything else, is what appeals to me about the game. Yet there are some out there who think they are hustlers, and some willing to violate their own integrity for a few bucks.

March 29, 2004

Why UN?

Filed under: International — Bunker @ 6:04 pm

NewsMax.com has an article by Wes Vernon onWhy U.N.’s Sea Treaty Is So Controversial. Five primary problems with this treaty, originally shelved by Reagan and brought back to life by Clinton, are:

# 1. The power to regulate seven-tenths of the world’s surface area.

# 2. The power to levy international taxes, a longtime dream of world government advocates.

# 3. The power to impose production quotas (for deep-sea mining, oil production, etc.).

# 4. The power to regulate ocean research and exploration.

# 5. The power to create an international court system to render and enforce its judgments.

I am absolutely opposed to anything that gives the UN power over the US. That is not simple nationalism, but a pragmatic decision opposing the formal empowerment of the UN in any way. Giving the UN authority to impose taxes, or control any aspect of commerce is a certain way to destroy democracy and free trade–the two things which have made this country great.

I intend to call my two “Republican” senators tomorrow and let them know what I think.

UPDATE: I just finished calling Senator Cornyn’s and Senator Hutchison’s offices to follow up on my email to them last night expressing my displeasure on this treaty. I then left a message at the White House, Texan to Texan. It won’t do any good if I’m the only one.

Running out of Windshield Stickers

Filed under: Military — Bunker @ 3:42 pm

New message from Birdie:

I just had to send you guys this picture. Sure enough it happened again. This time it was last night. I am really glad that someone invented bullet resistant glass. That’s twice now, if you are counting, that I have had a bullet strike the wind shield in front of me. The new guys are here. We should be leaving this country shortly.

bullethole (94K)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress