Bunker Mulligan "Let us endeavor so to live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry." ~Mark Twain

December 9, 2004

Gilbert’s Last Round

Filed under: Golf — Bunker @ 6:54 pm

Sunday was the last day my foursome played together at Gulf Winds. Dave, Herman, Gilbert, and I have been playing together every Sunday morning, first off the tee, for more than eighteen months. Gilbert played his last round with us before leaving for Huntsville, Alabama. I will begin playing regularly at my other course, so the foursome is falling apart.

Dave didn’t make it for the round that day, so Herman and I shared Gilbert’s company. The weather has been cool of late, but Sunday began at about 70 degrees. The mosquitoes loved it. These are the tough ones. When you swat them, they simply look up and say, “Is that all you’ve got?”

Gilbert plays a yellow ball, and when we feel there is enough light to see his tee shot, we’re off. He is a solid player, but doesn’t hit the ball long. He justs keeps the ball in play, takes his bogey, and revels in the occasional par or birdie. He was gone for a couple of weeks, and when he returned he hit the ball much straighter. We always claimed he had been off at the Leadbetter Academy getting first-rate instruction. When he hit a ball particularly straight, or put an approach shot close to the hole, we would call out, “LEADBETTER!” After a while, he claimed we were really insulting him, calling him a bedwetter. Gilbert never lost his enthusiasm, nor lacked any enjoyment of just being out on the course.

On the last hole I suggested he should get to choose which of our tee shots he would use on our last hole together. He pulled his, and Herman sliced his. I also pulled mine, but hit it long, about 100 yards beyond Gilbert’s ball, and 50 past Herman’s. So, Gilbert and I both played from my shot. Neither of us hit the green.

Regardless of mishits, mosquitoes, and the occasional penalty, we had a great day, like so many before. Gilbert will be back for one of the annual tournaments–after a few more trips to Leadbetter.

December 8, 2004

Zero Tolerance

Filed under: Education — Bunker @ 6:14 pm

Neal Boortz has a piece on a girl in New Orleans who was suspended from school for bringing Jello-shots to class for her friends. Although there was no alcohol in the Jello, the school determined these were look-alikes, and therefore the girl must go.

Someone on the net (I thought it was Reynolds, but can’t find it) noted that in his day, schools actually furnished refreshment that looked like vodka.

I dealt with school administrators like this. They had a book with punishments listed for specific violations. I never convinced them that some kids require different punishments for the same offense if the intent was to change behavior. A top student might be deterred by the threat of suspension, but others saw it a an additional vacation. “Zero Tolerance” is simply the way lazy school administrators deal with problems. No thought required.

What do we do now?

Filed under: Society-Culture — Bunker @ 6:04 pm

From the files of the “Be careful what you ask for” department:

On January 1, 2005, gays/lesbians (and many straight unmarried couples) must be married in order to keep their partners’ health benefits.

Several leading employers in Massachusetts are eliminating their benefits packages which had been extended to homosexual couples. Because these benefits weren’t provided to unmarried heterosexual couples living together, they felt it would be discriminatory to continue providing them to unmarried homosexual couples.

There are now, according to FoxNews, several groups arguing that it is unfair because the decision to marry is harder for homosexuals.

Tora! Tora! Tora!

Filed under: General — Bunker @ 11:31 am

Yesterday I saw portions of the movie on television. I really thought I understood the events at Pearl Harbor, but Larry points out there were shenanigans by the Bush clan even then.

Today, the Shrub went through the robotic motions of honoring the brave men, womyn, and transgendered who died at Pearl Harbor thanks to his family’s relentless quest for absolute power. No doubt, Bush naively believes that being born five years after that day of infamy excuses him from any guilt. But if the dead could speak, they’d cry out from their watery graves and demand he apologize and atone for his complicity in the attacks.

Go to the Weblog Awards and cast a vote for Larry. He is trailing Scott by a wide margin. Both are excellent, and I have a difficult time choosing my candidate.

December 7, 2004

Homespun Symposium IV

Filed under: International — Bunker @ 6:33 pm

The war on terror and the one in Iraq have not, as Arthur submits, created deep fissures through the international political landscape. The fissures have always been there. They have always been deep. Now, they are simply more perceptible as they have grown wider.

Nor are they aligned in a strict left/right split, although the argument could be made that the rift is between nations of a socialist/fascist bent and those with more liberal persona–liberal in the classic sense.

The latter group includes the US, Britain, Australia, and former Eastern Bloc nations. The former are those working toward an EU in conflict with the US, Russia, and the despotic Middle East.

France has always viewed our alliance as one of convenience. When we refused to share nuclear secrets with De Gaulle, the French decided to link up with the Soviet Union in many military and commercial agreements. They removed themselves from the NATO military structure, retaining the political tie “just in case.” As one writer recently noted, France will always be there when they need us. German intransigence is more difficult to define, but not surprising. They have had American troops in-country for more than fifty years. Familiarity breeds contempt. Even in Britain, this is something of a problem. Many in that country still live the thought, “Over-paid, over-sexed, and over here.” But the ties between us are far greater than any split can overcome.

Australia is much the same, but for other reasons. Our ties are those of siblings. Both nations grew from British colonialism, peopled by those the mother country didn’t care for, and adventurers looking to build their fortunes in the new frontiers. Our heritage is such that our peoples are almost interchangeable, yet we have our own distinctions.

The former Eastern Bloc have “lived it.” Socialism doesn’t work, and they know it all too well. They yearn for the openness we take for granted. The events of recent weeks in Ukraine should make that apparent. Yet all those nations have struggled through similar times, though not all were as dramatic. Remember Solidarity in Poland? Many of you probably don’t. How about Czechoslovakia in 1968? Even fewer remember. Those who have survived don’t want to return.

Wow. Maybe I am talking about right vs. left, although not in the sense most of us have of those two terms. On the right we have government “of the people, by the people, and for the people.” On the left we have the Marxist/Fascist philosophy of government “of the elite, by the elite, and for the elite.” Of course, it is never voiced in those terms. Throw a few crumbs and the lemmings will get in line, you know.

The fight in the Middle East is precisely that–a conflict between the two philosophies. Scratch the surface of any proponent on the left who is well-known and respected by others of his ilk in any way and you will find the “elite” watermark. The mullahs in Iran, Saddam, Arafat, Chirac, Annan, and even Kennedy all view their place on this earth as predestined by a God they don’t believe in. How heretical and hypocritical can you get?

December 7

Filed under: General — Bunker @ 7:10 am

December 6, 2004

What is News, really?

Filed under: Media — Bunker @ 5:04 pm

I beat up on MSM fairly frequently. Probably because they deserve it. But not all are inept and incompetent, resting on laurels given them by their peers. Some have actually received awards from real people.

Bill Bennett, someone some will immediately pounce on as a right-wing evangelical zealot, has a very good analysis of what is happening right now regarding MSM and the new media of blogging and talk-radio. Don’t let your perception of him one way or the other cloud your mind–go read it:

After the election, many statistics emerged. Perhaps the most interesting do not have to do with the mere shifts in the Catholic, Jewish, Black, or Hispanic votes. But, rather, why those shifts took place.

He talks about the things we in the blogosphere have discussed many times:

Speaking as a host of a three-hour talk show, it is evident that the public, which is checking assertions of fact as they are being made, is not sitting back and merely absorbing pontification.

People who get a portion of their news coverage from the internet certainly have a broad range to choose from. And the linking so prevalent in the blogosphere carries people to many points of view they might never have seen otherwise. This is the strength of the blogosphere, but has its dangers:

…the growth of “unfounded allegations” is at least as much a problem for the mainstream media as it is for the Internet.

Yes, just what I’ve chided Bill O’Reilly about (although he never heard it). And, yes, there is plenty of the same in our realm. But we have better fact-checkers.

The value of the blogosphere, combined with talk-radio, teaches another lesson: the experts can often be wrong-not just about facts but about what people care about, and even who’s in charge.

Here is another strength in the internet. We write about what we feel is important. We may get information from MSM sources, but we decide what is important enough to spend our time on. The focus of the news day is no longer driven by the newsrooms at ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, or FoxNews. We can check them all, along with news agencies and papers around the world, and talk about what we view as the top story. When enough of us share the same topic, MSM eventually must pick it up. When they do, they endure the wrath of the internet denizens if they get it wrong.

And they do get it wrong–intentionally or not. Much of the blame can be laid at the feet of those manning the microphones and word processors in the newsrooms. They just aren’t as intelligent or knowledgeable as this group. They have less real-world experience. Their perspective can be skewed.

What that means to us out here in blogland is that we have to pick up the slack in responsibility and experience. Few reporters know which end of an M16 points downrange. They could probably figure it out. We know. That little bit of difference can be huge in certain situations. We must continue to use our knowledge and experience properly. Add to the conversation, not just scream about something idiotic mouthed by a talking head. Pick up the loose ends. Ground everything to the inspection side.

I can live with inept reportage. What I don’t suffer is inept coverage compounded by arrogance. This is what ruined Dan Rather. Others will follow unless they pay attention and learn to take advantage of the experience and interest out here. For our part, we need to be ready when they finally ask.

More at PowerLine (where else?).

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress