Bunker Mulligan "Let us endeavor so to live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry." ~Mark Twain

July 10, 2004

Billy Mills

Filed under: Golf — Bunker @ 6:54 pm

Today our Club Championship Tournament started. My play was…not good. Let’s just say that if I manage to shoot ten under par tomorrow, nobody would accuse me of being a sandbagger.

Before we started, I asked about someone I hadn’t seen in some time–Billy Mills. Billy was diagnosed with cancer last summer, and wasn’t expected to survive past Christmas. He did far better than that, and died only a couple of weeks ago.

The last time I played golf with Billy was in a match play tournament. He and I were in our flight’s finals. Billy was a hustler. I understand he shot pool and made a few bucks doing that, also. He always had several side bets going in any round of golf. He also only played as well as he had to. No more, no less. Just well enough to win. That way he could keep his handicap as high as possible to fleece the unwary.

In our match, I had a 3-foot putt on the third hole for a birdie, and he conceded it. As we walked to the next tee, he asked, “You had a par, right?” When I told him that he had conceded a birdie putt to me, his face dropped. He won the next two holes.

Then, on the sixth hole, I outdrove him. He hit a nice shot to the green. I then hit mine, and it bounced, rolled, and went into the hole for an eagle. Now, understand, I have only had two eagles in my life before that. Once on a par five, then another with a hole in one. So it was a big surprise for me to hole out a shot from 130 yards.

The rest of the round went pretty much back and forth until we got to the 15th. I was down four holes, and he was looking to close out the match. I hit a nice drive and had about 170 yards to the hole. He hit his second shot on the green, and I followed. My shot hit the green, bounced twice, and rolled into the hole for another eagle. I thought Billy was going to cry. I made as many eagles in one round as I had made in my entire previous golfing career.

Billy was very quiet. He had me down three with three to play, and was determined to finish me off. I played the next hole badly, and he won it, along with the match. Only then did he get a smile, the first all day. “You can eagle the rest of the holes now for all I care!” Somehow, I won the side bet that day.

Nobody didn’t like Billy, and he will be missed.

Golf Classics

Filed under: Golf — Bunker @ 6:51 pm

I did a search for books by Bernard Darwin today and ran across Classics Of Golf, an online publisher’s site. They have published a series of classic golf books–about 60 of them. The Darwin book I bought recently is one of their line.

I added the link in my “Golf Stuff” category. Some very interesting things there.

Club Championship

Filed under: Golf — Bunker @ 4:20 am

0800 tee time this morning for the first round. Lots of time to meditate and hit a few on the range before teeing off. No wind yet this morning–could be an odd round!

July 7, 2004

Great Golf

Filed under: Golf — Bunker @ 1:40 pm

Now why do I need to go to BLACKFIVE to find out about a golfer who gets three or more holes-in-one in almost every round he plays? Not just that, he also shoots 38 under par regularly on a 7000 yard course!

I can’t imagine a golf course easy enough to accomplish that, myself. Holes-in-one may be frequent in miniature golf, but even there it is tough to score that low.

Mussolini’s Fascism

Filed under: Society-Culture — Bunker @ 11:48 am

Fascism is a little-understood and overused word. It derives its name from the Roman fasces carried by magistrates as a symbol of authority. A fasces is a group of rods bound around an ax. It’s strength symbolized group unity in Mussolini’s eyes, and thus became the symbol of his Fascist Party.

Fascism was a new word invented by Mussolini to identify his organization. There is no single definition of fascism, which makes it easy for people to throw the term around quite readily. Even Mussolini had difficulty in explaining it consistently. He began the movement as a socialist, and fascism evolved to mean government control, but not ownership, of all commercial activity. That is because people could not be trusted to run their own businesses to serve all:

“Fascism, now and always, believes in holiness and in heroism; that is to say, in actions influenced by no economic motive, direct or indirect.”

And

Fascism repudiates the conception of “economic” happiness.

Ownership did not fall into the hands of government, because that would be socialism, and Mussolini wanted to break from the Marxists in Europe. The appeal of Fascism and its nationalistic fervor inspired Hitler to add some facets of the ideology to his own National Socialist Party to counter the socialist influence of the Soviet Union.

What I know of fascism is its desire to control not only commerce, but society and culture. People equate strong nationalism as the definition of fascism, yet that was simply a rallying point for Mussolini. As with any dictator, the leader was more important than the country. The nationalism both he and Hitler espoused was race-oriented rather than bound by geography.

Mussolini wrote his manifesto in 1919. Which political party in the US does this sound like?

* The nationalization of all the arms and explosives factories.

* A strong progressive tax on capital that will truly expropriate a portion of all wealth.

* The seizure of all the possessions of the religious congregations and the abolition of all the bishoprics, which constitute an enormous liability on the Nation and on the privileges of the poor.

* The formation of a National Council of experts for labor, for industy, for transportation, for the public health, for communications, etc. Selections to be made from the collective professionals or of tradesmen with legislative powers, and elected directly to a General Commission with ministerial powers.

* A minimum wage.

* The participation of workers’ representatives in the functions of industry commissions.

Is fascism really right-wing?

Edwards

Filed under: Politics — Bunker @ 5:53 am

I really didn’t intend to talk at all about Kerry-Edwards.

I wonder how long will it take for Clinton to say something about Edwards like, “He reminds me of me.”

And isn’t it a bit disingenuous for Democrats to talk about Edwards growing up poor then becoming a millionaire? I thought every program they pushed was because that is an impossibility in this country. Obviously he must have won life’s lottery because Democrats don’t believe anyone can make it on his own.

The Oldest Beatle

Filed under: Society-Culture — Bunker @ 5:35 am

Ringo Starr (Richard Starkey) turns 64 today.

For those of you too young to remember, and those of you whose memory is clouded by age, the common rallying cry of the 1960s was, “Never trust anyone over 30.” Of course, all the current “radicals” in academia were the very ones who coined that phrase. Now they are. And they expect the youth of today to trust them.

Young people in the ’60s were strong and influential. 1950s music (which carried over until around 1963) was almost as processed as rock and country music today. Something sold, and everyone copied. Music “manufacturing centers” sprung up, and labels had teams of writers and studio musicians in house to create a specific sound for every singer they had on contract. The Beatles were a big factor in changing that. With George Martin, “the fifth Beatle,” they created new sounds and rhythms. When the Beatles released Abbey Road they were sitting on top of the world. They were the strongest influence in music at the time. When they did something musically, others attempted to imitate. Youth was on a roll.

They were all under 30 at the time. That same year, I think it was 1969, Rolling Stone did a cover story on rockers about to turn 30. “Never trust anyone over 30.”

Who are the under-30s today?

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress