Bunker Mulligan "Let us endeavor so to live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry." ~Mark Twain

December 14, 2003

I was wrong–I thought he was in Russia

Filed under: International — Bunker @ 11:01 am

I intended to write about my tournament yesterday. That was overcome by events.

The scene reminded me of Charles Manson. Saddam actually had the same look, and was captured hiding in similar fashion–Manson was curled up inside a small cabinet, and almost wasn’t even noticed.

Now I’m waiting to see the long line of American lawyers eager to defend the criminal of the century–pro bono. What would be a greater career builder or cap? John Edwards would probably be a good choice.

Of course, one of the first questions at the 4ID press conference was “What does this mean for the future? How will it change things in Iraq?” Reporters are obsessed with the future. I guess it takes too much talent to report events which have already ocurred engagingly. It’s much easier to predict the future when you’re not ever held accountable for the accuracy of those predictions.

It doesn’t happen only with hard news. The current celebrity trials are the same. I remember last year when Rich Beem won the PGA championship, during the news conference which followed, a reporter asked him, “Have you given any thought to how you’ll defend your championship next year?” One ABC talking head said something to the effect that “The Coalition will definitely want to talk to Saddam about where weapons of mass destruction might be in light of the fact that that was the major reason given for invading Iraq in the first place.” Why do I even bother to listen to ABC, CBS, NBC, or CNN?

Let’s simply celebrate the moment. Other people in positions of responsibility (certainly not the media) have decisions to make. Let them enjoy the good feeling that goes along with reaching this milestone along the road to security, and they’ll get back to work. And they’ll continue to do it well.

Zeyad doesn’t have anything posted, yet, but some good links at The Mesopotamian.

Howard Dean’s blog site has some interesting comments:

I can’t believe this. I’m crying here. I feel that we now don’t have a chance in this election.

Don’t forget–Dean has us–and that’s what will carry him through this media rapture with Hussein’s capture.

HEY GUYS WAKE UP!!!
THERE IS NO SUCCESS EXISTS IN THE UNJUSTIFIED WAR WHOEVER WAS CAPTURED!!!
IT IS ONLY A DANGEROUS ILLUSION OF SUCCESS WHICH MAY LEAD ONLY TO THE NEXT WRONG JUGMENT AND NEXT WRONG DECISION SUCH AS A NEXT WAR!!!

Term ‘success

December 13, 2003

NYTimes Editorial

Filed under: Society-Culture — Bunker @ 4:40 pm

David Brooks has written:

Sometimes you’ve got to be slippery to accomplish real good. The Bush administration is thus facing an insincerity crisis. It has become addicted to candor and forthrightness. It needs an immediate back-stabbing infusion.

Perhaps Al Gore could be brought in to offer advice.

Read the rest…even though it requires registration.

Also, take a look at this map with better definition than the Red States-Blue States map from the 2000 election.

Today was my last tournament as Tournament Chairman, and boy am I glad! More on that later.

December 12, 2003

Complicity

Filed under: Society-Culture — Bunker @ 2:53 pm

MSNBC is running a line on their screen that Halliburton won a $2billion contract without bidding. The folks there are either stupid, lazy, left-wing, or all of the above.

Haliburton, along with other companies, bid on a five-year support contract with the government to provide services on an as-needed basis. They are in the third or fourth year of this contract, which Halliburton bid on and won. This kind of support contract is common in the Defense Department so that the standard job-specific bidding can be bypassed on short-notice assignments. It is like keeping a lawyer on retainer.

For MSNBC to report that this job was assigned without a bid process is lying, unless they are as stupid and lazy I as I often believe they are. At the risk of having someone point out ‘You just want to bash Clinton,’ I’ll let you know another dirty secret: Clinton’s administration contracted Halliburton to provide support in Kosovo at a time when Halliburton didn’t have the support contract! Was that bad? No. There is not another company in the world which has the rapid response capabilities that Halliburton does. They are the best at what they do, and they do a lot.

On the same topic, has anybody noticed that the Pentagon is the entity checking into whether there were spending irregularities? The networks would not even know about this concern if an auditor in the Defense Department hadn’t said to its contractor, ‘This doesn’t look right.’ So where does the accusation of complicity lead?

December 11, 2003

Musings Unrelated to Golf

Filed under: General Rants — Bunker @ 11:45 am

I was thinking about Zeyad and his compatriots in Iraq, and my mind wandered, as it’s prone to do. I heard a quick sound bite of President Bush telling reporters that countries which risked troops to help free Iraq deserved first shot at reconstruction contracts. I also considered America’s place in the world at this point in history.

When any country in the world needs assistance of any kind–financial, military, medical, natural disaster relief, rescue services, technical, or just moral–they turn to the US. And not just because we have the best of all of those things. The entire civilized world, regardless of your definition of civilization, understands that Americans have big hearts. We actually care. Not ‘care’ as in being willing to march in protest or support of the current cause, but care as in wanting others around the world to share in the bounty that comes with freedom. We care that people suffer and we want to help them not suffer. We care that children in other countries die of starvation and we want to feed them. When a disaster strikes somewhere in the world, Americans are quick to donate money and volunteer to provide assistance personally.

When the World Trade Center towers came down, Americans ran to help where they could. Americans donated millions of dollars to help those directly affected. We poured our souls into the cause. We didn’t take to the streets in protest. And it was gratifying to hear support from around the world. To me, it seemed as though people in other countries actually cared about us as much as we care about them. That soon faded. Where were the legions of aid workers from around the world? Where were the millions of dollars in relief funds from other countries to help us in our time of need?

We got half-hearted support to invade Afghanistan. We got little support when we went into Iraq. In fact, France, Russia, and Germany were duplicitous in trying to prevent the invasion. They’ve been no help in the six-plus months since. Now that there are billions of dollars in contracts to be signed, paid for by US taxpayers, they want in. Bush won’t let them ‘help,’ and they’re pissed. The media focus has been on the $18 billion of US-funded contracts, but there are millions of dollars of ‘international’ funds which are available for bid by anyone. This is the money donated by the few countries willing to help bring Iraq out of despotism. France and Russia did not contribute, nor did they offer any debt relief. But they want to share in the wealth.

Zeyad and his friends in Iraq are aware of such things. I wonder if others there are as informed. I was thinking about him during a newscast; Typically, a ‘talking torso’ reporting from the roof of a hotel in Baghdad. We don’t see things except through that prism, so I looked back on my trip to Kuwait last spring as a starting point for trying to perceive things more clearly, and what a normal day for a normal person is like there.

With US and British forces in the vicinity, I would assume most people there understand what has happened in the last year. I can’t be sure, because my son related to me that he met people in rural Afghanistan who were surprised to see American soldiers. In spite of propaganda from many directions, I truly believe people understand we are in Iraq to help. I doubt they hear of attacks against coalition troops and support personnel, except those close to home. Why would it be otherwise? I don’t hear about daily murders in Houston or Los Angeles or Washington. Iraqis go about their daily business with little more than passing thoughts of the world’s politics. They will take help from whoever is willing to provide it. But I think, if they knew the diplomatic environment, and could choose who provided support, the US and Britain would be the overwhelming favorites. I know that Kuwaitis, twelve years after the fact, were very gracious toward me as an American: ‘You saved us from Saddam! You are welcome here!’

The US is not just the only military superpower remaining. We are more than that. We are a superpower in far too many ways to even detail. We are the superpower in the entertainment industry (why else would people who can afford to live anywhere stay in Hollywood?), we are the superpower in culture (the elite of every country bemoan the fact that their people want American records, food, and clothing). We are the superpower in medicine and technological advancement, food production (what other country pays farmers not to grow things?), and art. If people can get here, they come. We have what almost everyone else wants. And those that don’t want it, or don’t want us to have it, want to destroy it.

And that is the simple truth.

Why would we want the UN involved?

Filed under: International — Bunker @ 8:22 am

There is an interesting article on the National Post web site (Canadian newpaper). Interesting.

Though nominally still under UN control, the southern province of Serbia is today dominated by a triumvirate of Albanian paramilitaries, mafiosi and terrorists. They control a host of smuggling operations and are implementing what many observers call their own brutal ethnic cleansing of minority groups, such as Serbs, Roma and Jews.

In recent weeks, UN officials ordered the construction of a fortified concrete barrier around the UN compound on the outskirts of the provincial capital Pristina. This is to protect against terrorist strikes by Muslim extremists who have set up bases of operation in what has become a largely outlaw province.

And NPR is carrying a story about the reluctance of the UN to get involved in Iraq:

U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan says Iraq is still too dangerous for his organization to play a major role there, and staff members will fly in and out as needed to perform their duties.

The UN has no troops. The UN has “functionaries” and bureaucrats. Troops must be furnished by member countries to be controlled by these people. Guess who furnishes the majority of forces to the UN. So what would be different for us if the UN took over in Iraq? Look at Kosovo.

Also see InstaPundit

Texas Redistricting

Filed under: Politics — Bunker @ 6:49 am

What does the Voting Rights Act of 1965 have to do with redistricting? Well, if you listen to all the lawyers, congressmen, and special interest groups (NAACP, GI Forum, etc), “minority voters in Texas are denied an equal opportunity to participate effectively in the political process.”

I looked into this for you. Actually, it was more work than I expected. In fact, I still haven’t found the text of Public Law 89-110, even on the Library of Congress web site (the search times out). The best I could find was various descriptions. What the law did was eliminate the poll tax and literacy tests as prerequisites for voting. I remember this vaguely from my youth, as well. I was 12, and just returned from living overseas. It seemed a bit odd to me, which is why I remember it. I thought it only logical that you should be able to read if you wanted to vote. How else could you understand the ballot? I didn’t understand that this was used to exclude blacks from voting, because every black person I knew could read and write, some better than I.

To my knowledge, the law doesn’t prescribe rules for defining congressional districts or quotas for minority representation in Congress. So, what these Democrats are now saying is that if you are black or hispanic, your vote only counts if you abandon all interests which do not relate to the color of your skin. Groupthink.

I detest the concept of groups. I believe in individuality. This is the crux of the argument in this case, and for many other issues in this country. The plaintiffs here are being patronizing and condescending toward people who have a common ethnic or racial background. What they are saying is, ‘You must vote with others of your group or your vote is meaningless.

December 10, 2003

Healing Iraq

Filed under: International — Bunker @ 3:53 pm

Zeyad is an Iraqi in Baghdad. What he, and his fellow bloggers there, have to say is important. That’s why I have him linked as a daily read.

Today he was part of a demonstration against terrorism, and those in the world who want the US out of Iraq. He has posted photos, and also has links to other Iraqi bloggers.

Isn’t freedom GREAT!?

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress