Bunker Mulligan "Let us endeavor so to live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry." ~Mark Twain

March 25, 2005

Air America

Filed under: Media — Bunker @ 4:53 pm

One of my regular readers here in Corpus Christi informed me that Air America is now on our radio dial. So, I listened for a bit today. Well, when I got the chance.

For a little while at work I heard some of Al Franken’s show. He had a segment about dittoheads, which is apparently a regular feature, where he plays a clip from Rush’s show, and has a conservative friend comment. All I got to hear was Rush saying something about the Democrats being the party of slavery and segregation. Al’s co-host was quick on the draw: “That’s a snapshot in time!” I didn’t get to hear the remainder of the segment to see how it all played out.

On the way home I listened to Randi Rhodes. Well, during my twenty minute trip she gabbed and played a clip of Hannity and Colmes which she previewed with, “Listen how Hannity pauses so you can hear the protesters behind him chanting. Either they are really close or Fox News put microphones on them!” Well, they were probably close, but certainly not wired. And Hannity never paused for us to hear them during the clip she ran.

I’ll try to listen again sometime. It was all really pretty boring. Even tedious. No wonder Air America doesn’t do well. Rhodes, in particular, repeats herself, and what she says becomes a litany. Beyond that, most of what I heard today were commercials. A lot of them. New York City commercials. I certainly intend to run right down and sign up with the natural gas company in New York!

March 14, 2005

How to Choose a Newspaper

Filed under: Media — Bunker @ 11:16 am

Capt Trevett has them all pegged.

March 10, 2005

Accountability

Filed under: Media,Politics — Bunker @ 7:38 am

Politicians, newspapers, celebrities, and major television networks all claim that blogs are not accountable in the same way they are. That is true. It is also disingenuous. Blogs are certainly accountable, and in ways far more direct and dynamically than are those other entities.

If you were to ask a newspaper’s leadership how they are more accountable than are blogs, you would probably hear a list of accountability something like this:

“A reporter is accountable to his editor. The editor is accountable to the publisher. The publisher is accountable to the owner. The owner is accountable to the advertisers”

Who is missing from that list? Readers. Same for television news. Without readers/viewers, advertisers don’t pay.

Governor Rick Perry’s spokesman made it clear the other day that politicians in Austin, like politicians everywhere, don’t like being questioned without having some control over the questioning.

“The general public has to realize on blogs . . . there are no controls on accuracy or honesty. And there’s no accountability.

“People need to be very careful with what they read in the blogs. Most blogs seem to be run with a pretty severe liberal bent.”

Obviously, they don’t read blogs. If you want a severe liberal bent, you can find it. You can also find a severe conservative bent. And everything in between.

What controls on accuracy and honesty do you want? Mine are based on personal integrity. I won’t write anything I know to be false. Nor will I write on something I have doubts about, or something I know little about without stating I have doubts or too little information. Failing to do that, I can expect rapid response from readers with more knowledge than I have. And the ultimate accountability in the blogosphere is someone linking to an error on their own site and telling the entire world how stupid you are! The other seven million bloggers pretty much follow that same standard, regardless of political leanings. The percentage of bloggers who don’t is far smaller than that percentage in traditional media.

That’s nothing new, of course. Since the beginnings of this Nation, politicians have been taken to task by the people. As newspapers became the prevalent mode of distributing information, journalists took charge of the political discourse as their own turf. They did it in much the same way as blogs are now doing. Editors became, in their minds, Don Quixote armed with a press. In revolutionary France, journalists were the “Fourth Estate,” taking their place alongside the aristocrats, clergy, and citizens. MSM believe themselves to still hold that place, separate from the rest of us.

They have forgotten their roots, as have the politicians. Bloggers are Thomas Paines with keyboards and electrons and phosphors. Paine was accountable to his readers, and nobody else. So are we.

Politicians and MSM are having difficulty coming to grips with this new paradigm (I hate that word, but it fits). Their relationship, built over the years, is being called into question. So is their collective reputation. No longer can a politician with good press relationships (Kerry, McCain, Byrd) see his own missteps covered up. Nor can a politician with bad press relationships (Dubya) be taken to task without accusations being questioned (Rather). Bloggers quickly find chinks in their armor and a swarm develops.

Is that good? For the most part, yes. It can also cause harm. And that is something we need to watch.

But the Digital Gazette is a self-correcting entity. Those who make personal attack and unfounded innuendo their foundation will soon be shunned except by those who are virulently hard-core like themselves. Readers. Accountability.

Phony Soldiers

Filed under: Media,Military — Bunker @ 5:53 am

Why do bloggers hold many in MSM in contempt? Perhaps this local news station’s story holds a clue:

A former U.S. Marine who participated in capturing ousted Iraqi President Saddam Hussein said the public version of his capture was fabricated.

If you dig a little deeper, as do many bloggers, the story has many more facets.

“Later on, a military production team fabricated the film of Saddam’s capture in a hole, which was in fact a deserted well,” Abou Rabeh said.

Abou Rabeh was interviewed in Lebanon.

I think I would have been just a little suspicious.

February 26, 2005

Burka and Rather

Filed under: Media — Bunker @ 7:38 pm

Received the latest edition of Texas Monthly today, opened it up and saw That Blog Won’t Hunt. My first read of the issue.

Over the years, Dan Rather, the subject of Gary Cartwright’s cover story (Dan Rather Retorting), has withstood the criticism of presidents, members of Congress, and fellow journalists. But when CBS aired his 60 Minutes Wednesday report on young George W. Bush’s career in the Texas Air National Guard last September, Rather found himself assailed, and ultimately brought down, by an entirely different group of critics—the bloggers, anonymous commentators on current events with pseudonyms like “Hindrocket” and few, if any, media credentials, except access to the world’s biggest printing press: the Internet. Even while the 60 Minutes report was still being aired, bloggers were already attacking the authenticity of the documents on which it was based. As everybody knows, the bloggers were right and CBS was wrong.

Anonymous commentators? Well, Bunker Mulligan is the name of this site. My name is easy enough to determine if you care to know. I kept my moniker because my boys were, and will again be in dangerous places. No need to provide free intel about them. I’d hardly consider Hindrocket anonymous. Actually, his name is probably far better known than Paul Burka’s, the author of this piece.

Paul Burka joined the staff of TEXAS MONTHLY one year after the magazine’s founding. A lifelong Texan, he was born in Galveston, graduated from Rice University with a B.A. in history, and received a J.D. from the University of Texas School of Law.

Excuse me, Paul. I didn’t see any “media credentials” listed there except that you became a member of the staff. Does the janitor have media credentials, too? Sounds like your credentials and John Hinderaker’s are similar.

I like Texas Monthly. It’s similar to The New Yorker, only better. And geared toward the high-dollar folk in Houston and Dallas. They do throw a few bones our direction on occasion.

For those of you outside the Lone Star State, register and take a trial view. The access code this month is the name of a Texas city mentioned in the last paragraph. You’ll get a chance to read the last article before the next election by my candidate for governor, Kinky Friedman.

February 24, 2005

News Fans

Filed under: Media — Bunker @ 6:05 pm

Patterico has a thought for those in the media who disparage the blogosphere:

I have a very simple suggestion for mainstream media types who feel in any way threatened by bloggers: whenever you hear the word “blogger,” think: “reader.”

Yes, we are readers. Customers, if you will.

I read a lot. I have subscriptions. I pad site traffic on those sites–both subscription and gratis. That helps increase ad revenue.

The difference is that I can comment on my site about something on their sites. They don’t like it. They want a fanfest, I guess.

I once visited a site dedicated to David Arquette to find out who he was. I think he is a terrible actor, and couldn’t understand why anyone thought otherwise. Others who visited that site felt the same, and said so. One frustrated fan responded, “If you don’t like him, don’t comment. This is a place for people who like him to come talk about how good he is.”

I assume that’s why traditional media don’t care much for bloggers. And that’s a shame.

February 18, 2005

Fulton Allem

Filed under: Golf,Media — Bunker @ 4:07 pm

Well, traditional media are getting better.

I received the latest issue of Golf Magazine this week and was pleased to see they improved over the last issue. I’ll come back to that in just a minute.

First, though, the editors have come to realize there are actual bloggers out here who write about golf! They mentioned Grouchy Golf, SortaGolf, and No Three-Putts as sites to visit. I dropped SortaGolf myself a while back, but may have to return. Another they mentioned is somewhat typical of all things MSM: Blogger Vance no longer exists. Perhaps he has moved on to another site, but I haven’t located it.

Of course, these articles are written some weeks in advance of publication, but Blogger Vance quit writing some months ago. And no, Bunker Mulligan isn’t mentioned. Of course, I write far less about golf than the others.

There is an excellent article on a golfer I always liked: Fulton Allem. The article is an interview by the man I view as the best in the golf business, Peter Kessler. The two men are close friends.

Fulton is going home to South Africa. He had some very good years on the Tour, but fell on hard times with an injured back. After nearly twenty years in the US, he really isn’t thrilled about leaving.

I saw Fulty play at Colonial several years ago. He was paired that day with Nick Faldo–one of the slowest players on tour. Ever. One thing grates on Fulty on-course, and that is a slow playing partner. He once wrote on an opponent’s scorecard, “You are too slow.” Fulty is nothing if not honest and sincere.

On that tenth hole, both men hit the fairway very close to where I was standing. One nice thing about Colonial is that there is room and potential for interaction with players. I got where I wanted to be before they teed off, and had the distance judged just right.

Faldo walked up and stood by his ball as Fanny, his caddy, stepped of distance for the next shot. He surveyed the shot, then paced off a distance for himself. He then took a bite of banana and got a drink of water. Then he pulled a club, took a couple of swings, then put it back. Then he took a drink. Then he pulled a different club and took a couple of swings. Then he got the original club, took a practice swing, and only then did Fanny pull the bag away. Then he finally hit.

I almost lost patience and I was simply watching! Fulty got to his ball and hit it onto the front of the green. His birdie putt would be over a ridge and downhill to the hole from there. I commented in sympathy, “Tough birdie putt from there.” He looked at me like, “I really didn’t need to hear that right now.” I felt bad, but honesty is part of Fulty’s persona, too.

I’m sorry to see him go. He is one of those guys who sincerely enjoyed playing and being in front of the gallery. Most of his interactions with fans were better than mine, but that was my fault, not his.

If there were more Fulton Allems on the Tour, rounds would go by much more quickly, and fans would enjoy the game much more.

Good luck to you Fulty. It would be good to see you come back.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress