Bunker Mulligan "Let us endeavor so to live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry." ~Mark Twain

November 10, 2004

Illegal Immigation

Filed under: Government,International — Bunker @ 5:37 pm

We now know the deal Dubya cut with McCain to get his support in the election–Amnesty for illegal immigrants. This is not something Bush voters saw as a mandate, I can assure you. And it is not something I’m pleased about.

There are many reasons for both parties to want the flow of Mexicans into this country to continue. I just don’t know precisely why McCain is so interested. He has some kind of dealings with people who want the status quo. The average Arizonan doesn’t. Republicans really have nowhere near as much interest in having more here as do Democrats. There is the cheap labor aspect of things, which Democrats will tout as the primary reason for this move. But Democratic supporters are just as likely to hire them as Republican supporters. Tyson Foods, one of the biggest Clinton donors, is heavily into the illegal market.

And Democrats have always viewed Mexicans in the US as a prime voting block that historically goes to them. Bush made inroads into that group in his reelection as Governor, and now as President. But it certainly wasn’t enough to have a significant impact (regardless of Dick Morris’ evaluation).

There is something far deeper going on here. We send over a billion dollars to Mexico each year in aid. In return, they send us half a million immigrants, both legal and illegal. Mexicans account for the largest group of legal immigrants coming into the US each year, as well as the largest group of illegals.

Mexico is poor–40% of the population live in poverty. The society is very class-conscious, and moving from one class to another is nearly impossible. It has retained much of the caste system that existed from colonial times. Corruption is the byword in politics. The poor really have no hope except escape. And it is a really painful thing to see. It is difficult to imagine the risks taken by people desperate to do better for themselves.

The northern border is a political relief valve. Without the oppotunity for people to escape to something better, and money from those working in the US being sent home, the political system in Mexico would implode.

There is something very secretive in this mix. In issues regarding national defense, I defer to a President’s judgement of how much information can be released. In this case, there isn’t nearly enough.

November 8, 2004

Specter

Filed under: Government,Society-Culture — Bunker @ 7:49 am

We now have the first issue I will take with Republicans regarding the Bush Mandate: Senator Arlen Specter.

I’ll tell you right now that I have already written to my Senators and asked them to not support his ascension to the chair of the Senate Judicial Committee. But my opposition to him is not based in the same reasoning as those who promote this petition.

I have written several times, most recently here, that I don’t want any kind of “litmus test” applied to nominees for judicial appointments. (Does anyone younger than me even know what limus paper is?) We need Sumpreme Court Justices without agendas. In either direction. The Court is there to be sure our laws do not conflict with the Constitution. For that, they need to be better versed in the Constitution than in law. And no, the Constitution is not the Supreme Law of the Land. It is not law at all, but a mandate for operation of the Federal Government.

Senator Specter has already violated that mandate. For that reason, I don’t want to see him in charge of the deliberations of the committee which conducts interviews of potential justices.

November 5, 2004

Law Schools Admissions Report

Filed under: Government,Society-Culture — Bunker @ 6:48 pm

Rick Sander, a friend and associate of Eugene Volokh (let’s all get on the bandwagon and recommend him for the Supreme Court!), will be doing a four-part essay on Affirmative Action in law school admissions. Rick has compiled extensive data, and will spread out his analysis and conclusions thusly:

  • How does affirmative action in law schools work? (Monday)
  • How do racial preferences affect the performance of blacks in law school and on the bar? (Tuesday)
  • How do racial preferences affect how blacks do in the job market for lawyers? (Wednesday)
  • What would the black bar look like if we abolished or limited racial preferences? (Thursday)

Should be interesting.

November 4, 2004

Can we just follow the Constitution?

Filed under: Government — Bunker @ 7:50 pm

The Republicans are all patting each other on the back, and the Democrats are all bemoaning the stupidity of the electorate. I guess it has always been so. Now the time has come for the winners to enjoy the spoils, right?

Well, I supported Dubya because I believe he is the closest we can get to a President who believes in the sanctity of our Constitution. But I do not support the Republican Party. Nor any other party. Group identity is essential in a political organization. Or any other organization. And I’m a firm believer in individuality.

I am sick of hearing about gay marriage, pro-choice/pro-life, and every other “issue” which has been established as a way to identify us all.

And I don’t want Bush to nominate, or the Senate to consent to, any judicial appointment which has its basis the way a potential justice will lean on any issue. I want to see appointees who know and understand the Constitution inside and out. I don’t care if they have a law degree. I don’t care what the American Bar Association thinks about them. I want them to have good sense, morality, integrity, and a strong knowledge of the Constitution and its writing. They don’t need a background in Constitutional Law. That, in my view, is an oxymoron.

Newt Gingrich would be a good choice.

Andrew Napolitano would be a good choice.

But we are already hearing that new judges must believe the same on many issues as various interest groups. That is absolutely the wrong way to choose a Supreme Court Justice. And it is a primary reason I support Bush over any other Democrat or Republican. I think he will appoint the kind of person I would like to see on the Court. I may be disappointed, but he was certainly the better choice in this regard.

Tonight I visited the website for the Constitution Party. I looked over much of their information and downloaded their platform and like much of what I see–although not all. After all, I still hew to the individualistic nature I’ve developed over the years. Some of what I see makes me view them as something akin to the Libertarian Party, with an evangelistic slant.

But the Texas Chapter had some interesting information on the difficulty of getting a candidate on the ballot–any candidate who isn’t affiliated with either of the two major parties. And it is something that needs to be addressed both locally and nationally along with other election reforms.

I’ve got more to read later.

October 21, 2004

Censorship and Retaliation

Filed under: Government — Bunker @ 7:47 am

Power Line has an interesting poster, and some analysis.

During the current Presidential campaign, the Democrats have spun completely out of control, taking campaign hate speech to a level never seen before in American politics.

I worry when Democratic operatives mention retailiation if they get back into power. Sinclair was threatened if they showed “Stolen Valor.” And don’t think for a minute it was simply a threat. It was more of a promise. Terry McAuliffe has no compunction. The Clinton White House used the FBI and IRS to go after anyone not deemed “friendly.” I won’t go so far as to say Bill had anything to do with it personally, but there were plenty of people in that Administration who would.

“Both sides do it!” Right. Show me, please. I think if you went back to Nixon, you might have a point. He left in shame. Clinton was celebrated.

If you sincerely fear “brownshirts”, it might do you well to look at the people supporting John Kerry. If you want to see very real government censorship, pay attention to the leadership of the DNC.

Fear of Government

Filed under: Government — Bunker @ 5:37 am

Power Line has an interesting poster, and some analysis.

During the current Presidential campaign, the Democrats have spun completely out of control, taking campaign hate speech to a level never seen before in American politics.

I worry when Democratic operatives mention retailiation if they get back into power. Sinclair was threatened if they showed “Stolen Valor.” And don’t think for a minute it was simply a threat. It was more of a promise. Terry McAuliffe has no compunction. The Clinton White House used the FBI and IRS to go after anyone not deemed “friendly.” I won’t go so far as to say Bill had anything to do with it personally, but there were plenty of people in that Administration who would.

“Both sides do it!” Right. Show me, please. I think if you went back to Nixon, you might have a point. He left in shame. Clinton was celebrated.

If you sincerely fear “brownshirts”, it might do you well to look at the people supporting John Kerry. If you want to see very real government censorship, pay attention to the leadership of the DNC.

October 20, 2004

Back from the Courthouse

Filed under: Government — Bunker @ 10:20 am

No trial. The judge came in to speak with us before sending us on our way. This was to have been a capital murder trial. The defendant is an accessory to the man convicted earlier this week. That murderer is receiving his sentence today–life, or the death penalty. Apparently his cohort decided it was best to plead guilty and accept a lesser sentence.

The judge made the point that we were relieved of the terrible responsibility of having to determine this man’s future. And it is a heavy load. Personally, I can make that decision, but it wouldn’t make it any easier to do.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress