Bunker Mulligan "Let us endeavor so to live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry." ~Mark Twain

March 8, 2005

The Group Ahead®

Filed under: Golf — Bunker @ 2:37 pm

My weekend golf group, the self-proclaimed Dewbusters, are wonderful playing partners. Most have been playing together for many years, and I feel it an honor to have been accepted into the group. We have, permanently reserved, the first two tee times every Saturday and Sunday morning. Our bunch can number anywhere between four and twelve each round, and we divide ourselves up as we hit range balls in the pre-dawn darkness. Bob Fox, who “owns” the tees times, makes up teams before we go, and then we all head for the first tee box when he determines we are “burning daylight.”

Within each group of four (or five) playing the round, we have our own games going. Often it is a simple round-robin four-ball. Sometimes we play Wolf. And sometimes there are games within games where two players have had a running Nassau for more than a decade. At the end of the round we each throw a five into the pot, and members of the winning team get their five back. The rest of the money is split up for birdies, skins, and greenies.

We play fast, which is how most of us like it. Nothing is as unsettling as being behind a slow group of golfers, especially one with players of little ability playing as if they were tour pros. We don’t have that problem within the group.

Ah, the Group Ahead®. How terrible it is to be the group behind. Always waiting. I am often amazed to watch golfers in the Group Ahead® wait for the Group Ahead® of them. As I stand on the tee box waiting for the Group Ahead® to play their second shots, I marvel at the player standing at his ball in the rough 200 yards off the tee waiting for the Group Ahead® of him to clear the green 250 yards further away. He could not hit the fairway on his drive, and anticipates hitting the green–from a bad lie. So, I wait for him. Then he slices it into worse trouble.

Of course, I can then tee off–and wait again as he searches for his ball. With any luck he finds it quickly and is soon putting. Well, at least he is now looking at his putt. From every angle. Three times. By this time I’ve become unsettled enough that there is no way my approach is going to hit the green, and no chance we’ll finish the hole quickly enough to press them to allow us to play through. So we wait. Every hole. Until the break finally happens and we are invited to play through as they search once again for that stray ball.

Now we are the Group Ahead®. Of course, we all hit terrible shots in our rush to get out of the way, trying to be polite to those who just gave up the next hole to us. It is a law of nature that this happens.

For me, being in the Group Ahead® is as unsettling as being the group behind. When someone in my group is playing slowly, I rush. I don’t want to be the Group Ahead®. I don’t want to be the group holding up play. I want to press forward quickly and get some space between us and the group we just played through. Only then can I relax and settle into my own game.

The real paradox of the whole thing is that once we’ve put some turf between us and the group behind, we generally end up pressing the next Group Ahead®. And we come full circle.

Which is one reason why golf is such a mental challenge. And why Bobby Jones said the most challenging part of golf is the the course between your ears.

The Dewbusters don’t have those worries. We tee off first, and send our fastest players out in the first group. We can concentrate on golf. And the side bets.

Who owns McCain?

Filed under: Government — Bunker @ 5:32 am

Could this be the reason Senator McCain doesn’t like bloggers?

Sen. John McCain pressed a cable company’s case for pricing changes with regulators at the same time a tax-exempt group that he has worked with since its founding solicited $200,000 in contributions from the company.

Sounds like he has his fingers in the MSM pie.

(Hat tip to a new site I found through Roger L. Simon, Joel Malchow at Dartmouth.)

****UPDATE****
Ed has the details on the Keating Five scandal for those of you who don’t remember it.

March 7, 2005

Golf Blogs

Filed under: Golf — Bunker @ 6:52 pm

As I went through my Golf Blog links today, I decided to relocate some which haven’t been updated in a while. They may simply be on hiatus, and so shall they be labelled. At least, for a while. Golf is not an easy blog for keeping updated daily. Golf blogs come and go. I try to keep all of them I am aware of in my links. If they don’t update, I take them down. And some good ones have disappeared.

Jay Flemma has a friend, Tony, who maintains two golf blogs…. Well, one blog and one combination news service and forum. So, I’ve added both Web Country Club and Hooked on Golf to the list. The Country Club looks like a great place to stay up to date on tour events, so it will be a must-visit site during the heart of the PGA Tour season.

Diversity in Oregon

Filed under: Society-Culture — Bunker @ 5:10 pm

Taranto points us to a lodge that proclaims, “WE WELCOME DIVERSITY. Respecting the interdependence & diversity of all life.” They apparently require you to bring your notarized ballot from the Presidential election before you can register:

FOR REASONS OF HEALTH & SAFETY OCEAN HAVEN CANNOT ACCOMMODATE SMOKERS,PETS, FOLKS TRAVELING IN A HUMMER, OR FOLKS WHO VOTED FOR BUSH & HIS NATURE DESTRUCTIVE POLICIES

And they’re serious about smoke:

NO BEACH FIRES * NO BBQ * NO CANDLES * NO INSENCE.

At least, I think “insence” creates smoke.

Looks like a nice place. Unfortunately, I’ll never be allowed to visit.

Campaign Finance Reform

Filed under: Government,Politics — Bunker @ 9:04 am

I am going to propose the simplest, most easily enforced way to reform campaign financing while rescinding the McCain-Feingold Act (Bi-Partisan Campaign Finance Reform Act).

Only individual American citizens, may donate to any political campaign.

You will never see a politician propose such a bill for consideration. Politicians live by group donations. They thrive on corporate donations. Groups provide an easy way for politicians to speak in front of an audience.

Of course, not only will you never see such a bill proposed, nothing like this would never pass. Every interest group in the country would apply pressure in an example of teamwork not seen since the 1980 Winter Olympics. Without the influence groups bring to bear in elections, those very groups might simply wither and die. Those heading the groups would lose that gravy train. And so would the politicians.

Freedom of speech? The First Amendment was written to guarantee that right for individuals. Groups have no such right.

As the furor of last week has died down, I think it is time to revive it and push all our “representatives” to support it. Need an author for the proper wording? I think not. My second paragraph is all the law needs to say.

Oil or Democracy

Filed under: International — Bunker @ 7:36 am

Neal Boortz echoes some things we’ve heard elsewhere:

All of a sudden it would seem the Arab dictators in the Middle East are singing a different tune these days. Could it be because they have seen the United States liberate two enslaved peoples in Iraq and Afghanistan, bringing about free elections? Just as was the case with the fall of the Berlin wall and the collapse of the Soviet Union, once people have a taste of freedom, it can’t be stopped. It’s contagious.

Not so fast. Although the Arabs as a group are pretty inept in military terms, and are failing to deal with their own internal issues, they still have clout in the world’s marketplace. OPEC talks about oil reaching $80 per barrel within two years.

Can they do it? It depends on a lot of things, not the least of which is their willingness to forego some of their luxuries to balance the economic impact on people in their own countries. At first blush, many would view the price increase as a windfall to oil producers. Historically, that hasn’t been the result. OPEC often loses unanimity with big increases as one or more members strike sweet deals and sell more than their quota. Selling less, even at higher prices, can play havoc with an economy based on a single commodity.

Can the oil-rich nations of the Middle East balance the issues? With cries for democracy growing, and increases in oil prices possibly creating more economic problems within those same nations, the future could be democracy or anarchy. The desire to employ their only weapon against the West and the dynamism of western political ideas could lead to their own destruction.

Wallace, get that well of yours producing!

March 5, 2005

Democracy Project

Filed under: Government — Bunker @ 7:17 pm

I once admired John McCain as the maverick he often plays on TV. I then read his autobiography, and it was unsettling. I can’t quite say what really bothered me about it. Some things just seemed disjointed, and not in a literary or grammatical sense.

The Keating Five scandal was far greater than anything done by Enron executives, but McCain walked away almost unscathed. He operates in Arizona in the same way Robert Byrd does in West Virginia–untouchable due to his Vietnam record and his wife’s family’s influence.

His conflict with Bradley Smith goes back a long way. I wonder if there isn’t something McCain is worried about coming to light, and Smith has the flashlight.

And I’m for just about anyone who is against John McCain. I agree with Winfield Myers:

From my perspective, these amount to many reasons to like Bradley Smith, to believe he’s a man of integrity and courage, and to take heed to what he says. There is a segment of the Establishment that is annoyed by the need to hear criticism of their ideas and policy positions. In the past, they could count on the MSM to beat the drum for their causes and, in most cases, simply ignore their critics. That was certainly true in history of campaign finance “reform,” which was and remains a mandatory article of faith to John McCain and virtually the entire political left.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress