Our Constitution’s First Amendment is quite clear:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
For the last 30+ years, the liberal left has attempted to redefine it. They want the first portion to read “Separation of church and state.” They also have some problems with the “abridging the freedom of speech” portion. They are now running scared, and the panic is pretty easy to see. They have been quick to point out that people like Michael Moore and Whoopi Goldberg have a right to speak freely. Yet they do not offer the same freedom to the Swift Boat Vets. The Democratic Party embraces Moore, but tells Dubya he must condemn John O’Neill.
The world is changing before our eyes, my friends. No longer do CBS, ABC, NBC, New York Times, Newsweek, and NPR control the flow of information. And they are very afraid. FoxNews has been subject to demands for their license to be revoked. Walter Cronkite has condemned the internet as a haven for misstated facts. Individual bloggers are attacked. John Hinderaker and his crew at Power Line have taken personal hits from the local “major” media. These guys are pretty smart and up to speed on the facts. Not a smart move, in my humble opinion. They’ve have responded, but their antagonist is in hiding.
You cannot view FoxNews regularly and claim they are right-wing. The only reason you might have for doing so is by relativity. They actually employ some conservative reporters and anchors. Nobody else seems to. But they also have a wide range of perspectives represented.
Even the ones who are conservative, though, are professional enough to keep it outside their work. Brit Hume’s interview with John O’Neill was as tough as they get. He asked the questions that needed to be asked. And he didn’t let anything slide. I’d like to see Katie Couric be as demanding with someone like Michael Moore–ain’t gonna happen.
All this is having an effect. Again, Hindrocket takes the lead and points out that the Presidential race is tightening in the Battleground States.
This freedom of speech stuff is pretty good! Look at me. For a few bucks, a (very) little knowledge of HTML and CSS and PRESTO! I can publish my thoughts! The big difference here in Blogsville, though, is that if I say something that isn’t true, someone will point it out. Try that at the LA Times. The “Blogsville Gazette” kept the Trent Lott story going. It has kept the Swift Boat Vets story going–pretty non-partisan if you ask me.
I think the fear you smell belongs to those you would use the political system to control our society rather than be controlled by it. They are the leftist advocacy groups, the liberal politicians, and the mainstream media–both print and electronic. We who edit the “Blogsville Gazette” have another voice which is being heard more and more each day. And it is replacing the voices of those self-important folks who want to control our thoughts.
Lileks, of course, has a good take on it.
No magazine really reflects the world as I see it. They either magnify an interesting portion beyond its importance, or float off into irrelevance. Which is why I prefer the internet. Every day, a thousand pages. We make it. It
As I just wrote, I’m glad you’re not a golf pro.
The piece is a bullseye.
Comment by AH — August 22, 2004 @ 2:18 pm
I don’t get your point. Congress passes laws, which, the constitution tells us, can’t be related to religion. So how does religion get back into the equation. A God-fearing America might sound all hunky-dory to conservatives living in Alabama. But let’s use our imagination a bit and imagine moving to a school district that is Muslim or Buddhist. Would you want your kids to be in a classroom where everyone gets up and bows to Mecca in unison 3 times per schoolday> Or a school where the Hindu version of creation is taught in lieu of Darwinism? Actually, I don’t lose too much sleep over the creep of religion back into our civil life. If you feel strongly about this, go for it! In a few years, the Catholics will be arguing with Protestants over pictures of Mother Mary in the classroom as Lutherans rave about LDS “intrusions.” And Christianity will die, as it has in Europe, as young people associate it with institutions. We Buddhists will stand back, with a serene and knowing smile, as all of you fight with each other.
Comment by Karlo — October 7, 2004 @ 1:52 pm
Karlo, I’m not sure what your argument is. I believe the Constitution actually means what it says. So did Madison, who wrote most of it. In fact, his original version of the First Amendment said, “The civil rights of none shall be abridged on account of religious belief or worship, nor shall any national religion be established, nor shall the full and equal rights of conscience be in any manner, or on any pretext, infringed.” That tells me that if someone wants to pray in school, the government cannot infringe on that right.
Does this mean schools must accomodate all religions? I would say that is up to the school district, not the federal government. They certainly have no business establishing a national religion.
Comment by Bunker — October 7, 2004 @ 4:28 pm
BACKBONE
When the left-wing minions descended upon me a few months ago, spewing hatred and insults, it hurt. It hurts to be called names and told you’re stupid and worthless. At that time, I found comfort in asking myself What Would…
Trackback by trying to grok — August 23, 2004 @ 12:36 am