I saw a report on Kerry’s campaign. He hit California, and met with grocery workers who have been on strike for months. He said something like “Bush helps businessmen and ignores workers.” This plays well with unions. It’s BS, and he knows it.
This is a line of logic I cannot follow. The union where I work gets an hour during orientation to try and convince all new employees to join. They actually said, “You are on probation for a year, and management will do everything they can to find a reason to fire you.”
I disagreed, asked a few pointed questions they couldn’t answer, and was escorted outside for individual counseling.
I’ve hired and fired people. Neither is an enjoyable experience. To hire someone you go through all the trouble to write a position description for an ad, collect and review dozens (if not hundreds) of resumes, interview several you think fit best, offer the position to one of them, negotiate a salary, walk them through their first few days, and train them in your own procedures. Whew!
Now, after doing all that, why in the world would anyone try to fire someone they just hired?
If you need to fire someone, it is a big decision. It not only affects you emotionally, but makes you wonder about your skill in judging talent. And you then are short-handed until you complete the process all over again. Trust me, when you hire someone, you want them to succeed.
A business and its workers are a partnership. Both depend on the other to succeed. If a business doesn’t take care of its workers, they leave for somewhere that does. They don’t think anything about the problems of their leaving. A good business knows this, and works to keep good employees.
But unions look at their role as one of confrontation rather than partnership. I hear it almost every day. Management did this. Management plays favorites. Management did that. I always tell them that when I was in management, I played favorites. My favorites were the people who did the best job. And I made sure everyone knew who my favorites were, and why they were my favorites. It is called rewarding merit.
And that is anathema to unions. Unions are based on seniority, not competence. In fact, unions want everyone to produce equally. That way, nobody looks bad. When that happens, a business has to hire more workers. It can then pay them less, have fewer benefits, or go out of business.
If businesses have it so good, the thing for these folks to do is start their own.
Making statements as Kerry did simply makes me revile him more than I already did.
Uncivil Unions
I’ve recently started reading Bunker Mulligan, whom I found via Sarah. In this post he is describing his reaction to Kerry and his Union pandering. Laying out some experiences he’s had with unions in the past, I see a similar…
Trackback by Spectra — March 1, 2004 @ 4:48 am