Bunker Mulligan "Let us endeavor so to live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry." ~Mark Twain

August 26, 2004

Gerrymander

Filed under: Government — Bunker @ 2:10 pm

As I look at the political landscape this electoral season, I am reminded of the pitched battles that took place here in Texas over redistricting. The Constitution calls only for a census to be taken every ten years, and the Congressional districts realigned to match that census. Nothing more. Everything else returns to the States for implementation.

Gerrymandering is a tool of the political class in this country, and it flows for both major parties. In particular, it is meant to protect an incumbent, or to provide for an anticipated majority from one party or another in a particular district. In Congressional races, it has become almost prophetic–only four of the 435 incumbents were defeated in 2002.

Iowa is one state which has eliminated the politics of redistricting almost completely. Iowa now has five Congressional districts, all of which are competitive except for the western portion of the state. It is pretty solidly Republican. But that’s okay, because the districts were determined without any reference to the voting patterns, religion, or race of a particular area. The lines were drawn using some simple rules:

  • 1 – population equality,
  • 2 – contiguity,
  • 3 – unity of counties and cities (maintaining county lines and
  • Indeed

    Filed under: Government — Bunker @ 10:45 am

    I just added Varifrank to my blogroll, and will add him to my links list at the first opportunity.

    Because I didn’t start the blog so I could dig up the obvious on John Kerry. Frankly, its just too easy.

    I feel the same. It amazes me that anyone still feels he is Presidential material.

    Frank, welcome to my blog world. You have good things to say, and you say them well.

    Again…?

    Filed under: Military — Bunker @ 6:17 am

    Once again, Abu Ghraib is pushed to the front of the news line. Got to send Kerry’s problems back somehow, I guess.

    The latest report to come out works its magic to try and blame everyone in the chain of command, up to and including Rumsfeld. I think what bothers me most is that many of our journalists and politicians are so out of touch with reality, having never held a corporate job, that they can’t grasp the simple reality of an organizational structure. And they certainly don’t understand military organizational structure.

    Just look at any company and its workforce. How many people who work for Daimler-Chrysler even know who the CEO of their company is? Do they feel like they are guided in their day-to-day activities by this person? Are they?

    Contrast that to the military, where just about every soldier knows who Rumsfeld is. But they may not know who their Division Commander works for. The highest level that would be expected to have any knowledge about the goings-on in Abu Ghraib would be General Janet Karpinski (I have to wash my mouth out with soap after linking that rank to her name). But even in her case, I don’t know that she would have been up on all the nocturnal doings at the prison. She certainly wouldn’t have told anyone above her unless there were problems she couldn’t handle. And if she couldn’t handle them, why was she wearing a star? The same can be said for the colonels, majors, and captains working for her.

    Even at lower levels, much goes on that the boss knows nothing about. I was deployed with several of my younger mechanics once and heard stories about one of them involving a beautiful woman and Oreos (I’ll leave it at that) that I would have never known about except in the context a close-quarters deployment. I was a captain.

    Any person who feels Rumsfeld should resign over this needs to take a look at the place they work, and put it all in perspective.

    “John Kerry eats worms”

    Filed under: Politics — Bunker @ 5:27 am

    This morning I heard something on the radio that made a lot of sense. Jim Lago, a local radio host and man about town, pointed out that Frank Burns is a live and well, and serving in the Senate as the Junior Senator from Massachusetts.

    August 25, 2004

    Have clubs–Will travel

    Filed under: Golf — Bunker @ 9:04 pm

    Two years ago I had a month-long trip to Groton, Connecticut. It was early fall, and expected to be easy weather. My lovely wife suggested I buy a travel case for my golf clubs. I like to tell people she suggested it so I’d stay out of bars and away from loose women, but she knows there’s no danger there. The purpose is to allow me to play golf. Period.

    Groton has a wonderful municipal course, Shinnecosset. It is a Donald Ross design, first built in 1898. Ross came to the US in the early 1900s and finished it off, leaving his unmistakeable mark. It has wonderful fairways with deceptive approaches to the greens–those domed greens. Three new holes have been added after the city ceded some property to Pfizer for expansion. The company purchased a piece of property jutting out into the Thames Estuary for replacing the holes lost to construction. One evening I played and had the pleasure of seeing the sun begin to set across the river behind the 16th green–a golden hue washed the fairway, and I stood on the green for several minutes after holing out just to take in the view for as long as it lasted. It was a magical experience to play a course designed by a master and to be treated to the show as well.

    I’ve become much more interested in golf architecture in the last five years or so. I began keeping track of the courses I’ve played, and the architects who designed them. I’ve played some by the old masters–Ross, Tillinghast, MacKenzie, Neville–and some of the better-known tour pros-turned-architects–Palmer, Player, Devlin, Burke, and Norman. I prefer the old guys.

    Here in Texas we have the honor of several Tillinghast courses. San Antonio has three of them: two at Fort Sam Houston, and the San Antonio Country Club. He also designed Cedar Crest in Dallas, which was once a country club and hosted PGA events, including a PGA Championship in the ’30s.

    What I like most about the old masters is their ability to see a course in the landscape, then construct it in their own style with little moving of earth. They let the ground determine the flow of the game, much like the old links courses in Scotland.

    The Greg Norman and Gary Player courses have a similar feel, although earth-moving equipment is far more handy than it was early last century. Of the tour-pro architects, I prefer their styles. In particular, Player’s layouts are designed with every level of golfer in mind. He doesn’t take the Robert Trent Jones approach and simply construct very long tee boxes. In fact, the difference in length from the different tees isn’t extreme. What he does is design landing areas for different skill levels such that some help is provide for the duffer who strays off-line only slightly, but the long-knocker better hit where he’s supposed to. He also sets up approach shots to force you to think your way to the green and use a variety of clubs to do it. The same thing MacKenzie advocated and succeeded in doing at places like Pasatiempo and Augusta National.

    I always play from the tips on a new course just to see what the architect wanted to accomplish. Usually he accomplished it at the expense of my score.

    But I love it.

    The dog that didn’t bark

    Filed under: Politics — Bunker @ 8:02 pm

    Where did I see a reference to that Sherlock Holmes clue–somewhere today on the web?

    With all the noise made in Boston last month by the biggest names in the Democratic Party, you would think that some of them would come to Kerry’s defense. Edwards is the only one helping his partner out. And he’s doing a great job of whining.

    There’s a reason we haven’t heard anything from the Clintons, Kennedy, Gore, et al. They just enjoy seeing him hanging in the breeze, I guess.

    Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act

    Filed under: Government — Bunker @ 12:01 pm

    A 527 organization, such as MoveOn.org and Swift Boat Veterans for Truth are called such due to the section of the IRS tax code they comply with.

    According to the IRS, a Section 527 (

    « Newer PostsOlder Posts »

    Powered by WordPress