Bunker Mulligan "Let us endeavor so to live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry." ~Mark Twain

October 19, 2004

Dubya’s my man

Filed under: Politics — Bunker @ 5:31 pm

I voted yesterday, so now I can sit back and watch the rest of you ponder. I no longer need to. Of course, it really took little weighing of facts to draw my conclusion, so any further mental energy expended in the process would have been wasted. John Kerry is nowhere close to being as qualified as George Bush.

Bush always seemed sincere to me, but really nothing more. He did well as Governor, which is a job with little real authority or responsibility other than building consensus. I voted for him in 2000 for that reason. I felt we needed someone who could pull both sides back together.

He tried. But the other side was completely unwilling to move toward the center. They now blame him for their constant move farther left.

9/11 changed us all, but it really played to Dubya’s strength. He is decisive, not divisive, although that charge is still levied on him. He showed strength and determination. Most politicians actually do see the world as it is, in spite of what they might say. But Bush said the things that needed to be said. And he meant them.

Afghanistan was the killer of empires, and a human calamity waiting to happen. Bush took the politically risky step of going after the Taliban. And never forget how big that political risk was. Within days of our attack, the naysayers were already claiming quagmire. It wasn’t. People like John Kerry will now say they supported those actions. They didn’t. They constantly warned we were going to fail, just like in Vietnam.

Bush proffered many reasons for going after Saddam, the least of which was his potential for furnishing WMD to terrorists. The original Cease-Fire agreement from 1991 gave any UN member authority to take him out if he failed to comply. With nothing more than that, we already had UN support. Bush went to the UN once again to try and build consensus, already knowing France and Russia intended to block him if necessary. When they did, he ignored them. Again, a political risk which he may now pay for.

Most Americans will whine and complain about their choices at the ballot box every election. I don’t know how they can seriously do that this year. If we had two John Kerrys running against one another, I would be complaining, too. Is Bush perfect? No way. And he would tell you that and mean it. Will he whine about how unfairly he’s been treated? Hasn’t yet.

But if you want a President who is not just another politician, this is your chance. For all his faults, George W. Bush is the kind of man I always wanted to have in my organization. He will look at the issues, and make a decision. He won’t check the latest poll or focus group data before doing so. When he says something, he means it, and wants to be as clear as he can be. Not once has he whined about lies being told of him. He has always been positive about the direction he wants to go.

Hell, I would have liked to have him as a commander. It doesn’t surprise me that most in the military like him as their Commander-in-Chief.

I see no option, and that’s exactly how I voted.

Moveable Type

Filed under: Engineering — Bunker @ 1:25 pm

I’m really getting upset about the software I use on this blog. I’ve been using MT since last January. The manual isn’t friendly to someone like me who doesn’t know UNIX or servers, and I’ve run into several issues which have driven me almost over the brink.

The latest is the commenting system. I don’t moderate comments. I don’t want to. but for some reason, all on its own, my MT installation has decided I have to. I can’t understand why. I’ve checked the configuration within, and the configuration file, I’ve contacted my hosting service to see if they did some kind of upgrade which might have caused a communication error. I reloaded configuration files, and done everything else I can think of.

If any of you have run into this, or have advice on the transfer to WordPress, I would appreciate you leaving a comment.

Of course, I’ll have to approve the comment, first.

Arthur Chrenkoff

Filed under: International — Bunker @ 6:44 am

I picked up a link to Currency Lad from Kev. The post is a celebration of Arthur’s rise to fame through the posting of good news from both Afghanistan and Iraq, something seldom seen in MSM.

The trouble is that news agencies and many, if not most, of their operatives choose not to bring balance and breadth to their coverage of affairs. Their sense of journalistic responsibility has been subsumed within a political or, at least, narcissistic desire to provide daily Gotcha Moments for an audience presumed to be on the verge of democratic outrage. Call it the Woodward and Bernstein Syndrome.

If you aren’t following Arthur’s writing, you should be. And the Currency Lad looks like he has a handle on things as well.

While you’re at it, check out this week’s “Best of Homespun Bloggers,” which include Arthur, here.

October 18, 2004

Early Voting

Filed under: Politics — Bunker @ 6:18 pm

Early voting began today. Since I was already at the courthouse for jury selection, I got in line.

No, I didn’t vote a straight ticket. But it was mighty tempting.

Miscellany

Filed under: General Rants — Bunker @ 5:04 pm

Last post was #1000. Makes me feel old.

I was in the last group of pool members selected today. My group had 80 people in it. I think that means it will be a trial of some notoriety. I go back Wednesday morning for voir dire.

I also opened up the blog today to find several comments awaiting approval. How did that happen? I don’t have this blog set up to monitor comments. I did have several spams yesterday that Blacklist dealt with, so perhaps it automatically switches over when it sees too many too often. I checked configuration, reset, and rebuilt. Sorry if you posted and didn’t see your comment right away. I don’t get enough to worry about, and certainly don’t arbitrarily block anyone. In fact, I’m not sure I’ve blocked anyone.

Health Care

Filed under: Government — Bunker @ 6:55 am

I just saw Kerry’s Communications Director being interviewed. She blames Bush for the fact there is a shortage of flu vaccine. When asked what Kerry would have done differently, she said he would have found more vaccine. When pressed, she said something should have been done sooner.

Wow. That sounds like solid policy.

She also said that Bush is not protecting the health of the American people.

When did that become a function of government?

Jury Duty

Filed under: Government — Bunker @ 5:15 am

This morning I report for the jury pool. As I mentioned before, I don’t mind jury duty at all. In fact, I feel like I’m doing something important.

What I do dislike is the assumption that my life story is open for review. The standard form I received asks for such standards as race, sex, age, and whether I’ve ever served on a jury or been a party to a lawsuit. Okay.

I refuse to fill out the rest of the form. And I always have. They have no need to know my wife’s name, occupation, or employer. Nor do they need to know my medical history or education level. Or my religion. They may want that information, but they don’t need it.

When people talk about lawsuits and the costs that come from large awards they always focus on lawyers. That’s the wrong argument. Lawyers are out to make a buck, just like the rest of us. They’ll make as much as they can. Good for them. Don’t tell me, however, that they’re being altruistic and trying to help others. They’re not.

We need to look at jurors. Those large awards aren’t decided by lawyers. They’re determined by juries. A lawyer’s job is to find jury members who will be sympathetic and willing to punish “Big Corporations” or “Big Insurance.” They do this via survey forms and voir dire. They hire jury consultants to help them in this quest. Personally, I’d like to put jury consultants out of business.

A jury needs to be made up of people who are impartial–as much as anyone can be–and willing to listen and make decisions based in fact. For a plaintiff in a negligence suit, that may not be the best hope for their suit. For a criminal on trial who is guilty, that isn’t the desired panel to face. Both want a jury that is pliable and emotional. In a criminal case, the lawyer wants to find at least one who will see things his way, and get no verdict. That puts a load on the court system, and perhaps gets a favorable plea bargain.

This is where lawyers get their reputation for sleaze. Truth isn’t important. Manipulation is.

I don’t like people trying to manipulate me.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress