Bunker Mulligan "Let us endeavor so to live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry." ~Mark Twain

April 8, 2004

Anti-Americanism

Filed under: Bunker's Favorites,International — Bunker @ 6:43 am

Here is a review in the Asian Times of a book I’ve not heard about. The book is Anti-Americanism by Jean-Francois Revel, French-English translation by Diarmid Cammell and is reviewed by John Parker.

I need to locate this one, although I think it might make me mad to read it. Revel actually spent time in the US, a modern Alexis de Toqueville, and draws his conclusions of American values from his conversations with real people. The Frenchman takes no prisoners in his text:

The most notable characteristic of Anti-Americanism, as a text, is the blistering, take-no-prisoners quality of its prose. Even those diametrically opposed to Revel’s views would be forced to acknowledge his skills as a pugnacious rhetorician who does not eschew sarcasm as a weapon.

A few examples will suffice: referring to anti-war banners that proclaimed “No to terrorism. No to war”, Revel scoffs that this “is about as intelligent as ‘No to illness. No to medicine’.” Responding to the indictment of the United States as a “materialistic civilization”, he says: “Everyone knows that the purest unselfishness reigns in Africa and Asia, especially in the Muslim nations, and that the universal corruption that is ravaging them is the expression of a high spirituality.”

For anyone in this country beginning to feel we are on the wrong path, and that our critics around the world just might be right, reading this review is important. Whether the book can hold your attention as well as the review is yet to be seen. But the review itself is a revealing discourse. And any self-flagellating Americans might pay attention to some lines like these:

…countless commentators have parroted the cliche that the “war on terrorism” is unwinnable, but how many have noted the obvious, undeniable corollary that Osama bin Laden’s self-declared war on the United States is equally unwinnable?

Therein lies another exquisite irony: the costs of anti-Americanism will be borne not by Americans, but by others. And their numbers are vast: Cubans, North Koreans, Zimbabweans, and countless others suffer and starve under their respective tyrannies because the democratic world’s chattering classes, obsessed with denouncing the United States, can’t be bothered with holding their criminal regimes to account. Meanwhile, in Iraq, fascist rabble, with no discernible political program save a pledge to kill more Americans, try desperately to extinguish the slightest hope of democracy, economic growth, and stability for that long-suffering land; but the world, instead of helping to beat back the wolves at the door, basks in anti-American schadenfreude. How countless are the political problems, cultural pathologies, and humanitarian disasters that fester unnoticed, all over the globe, as the anti-American cult, wallowing in ecstatic bigotry, desperately scrutinizes every utterance of the Bush administration for new critical fodder.

The review is an essay in itself. Hit the link, copy and paste the text into something you can read at leisure. And bask in the fact that there are folks out there who understand Americans often better than we understand ourselves.

Condi

Filed under: Politics — Bunker @ 5:46 am

I respect Condoleezza Rice as much as anyone in government leadership. She may actually top the list. She is intelligent and has that touch of aristocratic charm that says, “I’m good at what I do,” without being arrogant. And she speaks straight. When shopping for jewelry, she asked to see gold and lady behind the counter made a rude comment.

“And so I said, ‘Let’s get one thing clear. If you could afford anything in here you wouldn’t be behind this counter. So I strongly suggest you do your job,’ ” Rice recounted to Essence magazine.

Today she again goes before the 9/11 Commission. I think they would be wise to tread lightly. She is the intellectual heavyweight in this confrontation.

April 7, 2004

Sons

Filed under: Military — Bunker @ 12:53 pm

The first soldier from Midland has died in Iraq. Wallace has the story. The only thing I can add is a comment after seeing this in his post:

First Lady, Laura Bush was in town visiting her Mother, and made a point to visit Mrs. Munoz at her home. About all I can add is that my heart is heavy with grief and sadness for Roberts family. My heart having been through this before with comrades, personal friends and loved ones some 30+ years before in another time and place.

My boy comes home Friday. Mrs. Munoz’ son will never come home. Can you understand how grateful I am?

Go Marines!

Filed under: Military — Bunker @ 9:34 am

Just saw this at Neal Boortz’s site:

American Marines are now in Fallujah … collecting the garbage, so to speak, after last week’s attack on four American civilian contractors. One reporter says that this is a rout for the Marines. We’re told that the bodies of Iraqi insurgents are being stacked like cordwood. Good. Let them stay there and rot. A reminder of what will happen to those who test American resolve.

I haven’t seen anything else, and Drudge doesn’t come through the firewall here at work.

Now, if they just do the same to the chubby little crybaby in Najaf…

Performing Artists

Filed under: Society-Culture — Bunker @ 9:10 am

Bogey wants to hear my thoughts on why so many people in the arts and entertainment world are leftists. I have to say I don’t have any first-hand knowledge of any of these folks, so everything I believe is based solely on an attempt to understand their psychology. I have to say, though, that having been involved with a variety of folks over the years, and having done more than my share of counseling, I have some expertise in understanding people. Unfortunately, none of the folks I’ve dealt with have been in that business. So I have to depend on what I hear in interviews or statements.

Having dispensed with the necessary disclaimer, let me just say they’re just a bunch of friggin’ idiots who offer nothing of value!

Whew. Now I feel better.

I don’t really understand the attraction to socialism. This group have been quite happy in the past to show disdain for the Federal Government, yet they expect that same government to be more involved in people’s lives. I know that making it in art and film is rare. Many people struggle for years, even lifetimes, trying to become one of the rich and famous. Perhaps this link to poverty makes them feel that anyone can do it if the government simply helps more.

Yet market forces drive these industries, and the ones who have “made it” want that to continue. If a performer can command seven-figure paychecks for a few weeks of work, it is because someone feels that money is well-spent–an investment. If we were to become a pure socialist or fascist state, everyone would get the same income, and it wouldn’t be seven figures. So why are the people the ones who want to divorce the country from the very system that made them millionaires?

I think there is a little bit of social embarrassment. But that doesn’t answer for those who are still on the lower rungs of the business, and who can be just as strong in their advocacy for socialism.

For visual artists, those who paint and sculpt, there is an urge to get the government involved so they can make a living at what they do. European countries have Ministers of Cultural Affairs (is that not fascist?) who dispense money to artists they deem deserving. In the US, we have the National Endowment for the Arts which does something similar. Art doesn’t pay. So if you want to be an artist, you can either produce something marketable, or try to get the government to buy it. Which is why most “art” you see in government buildings is garbage. Nobody else would buy it.

Maybe the psychology has something to do with the nature of creative work. People in the arts strive to produce something that affects people emotionally. It makes them happy, sad, pensive, angry. You won’t find a more rabid mob under control of a single individual than you see at a rock concert. That emotional link between the performer and his audience can be scary. I remember the Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young live album Four-Way Street, when Stephen Stills sits at the piano and plays “49 Reasons” (I believe it was) and eventually goes into a musical rant against the government and politicians. I only experienced it on an album, but he had the entire audience in his hands.

So, maybe they simply live in a world where feelings are everything. Emotion rules. That is the best reason I can come up with. Emotion is the logic of the left. If you don’t do anything good, but feel good about wanting to, then you’ve accomplished something.

Sorry, Bogie. That’s the best I can come up with. Maybe you can post your thoughts. You are the musician and performer in the family!

Birdie–Outta there?

Filed under: Military — Bunker @ 6:41 am

I got a call from Ft Bragg last night that Birdie will be arriving back in the Land of the Big PX late Friday night.

Muqtada al-Sadr

Filed under: International — Bunker @ 6:19 am

This morning on NPR, Bob Edwards spoke with a “Middle East expert” from Sarah Lawrence College. Why an expert from a small liberal arts college near New York City has greater insight than anyone else, I can’t judge. His conclusion was that Iraqis are causing trouble because they feel insecure. If American troops can’t even protect themselves, how can they protect Iraqis.

If that isn’t circular reasoning, I don’t know what is. Edwards went on to discuss Muqtada al-Sadr and his position in all this. The tacit conclusion seemed to be that the US failed when it didn’t arrest al-Sadr months ago, so we have nobody to blame but ourselves.

My view is that he wasn’t seen as a threat before because he has such a small following, and the Coalition didn’t want to spark any controversy in Iraq by picking up a cleric. But Muqtada al-Sadr is now upset because he’s not getting enough attention. “I’m important!” My opinion was confirmed when I opened Outlook this morning.

I receive an email on a weekly basis (although it is often an irregular week) from Iraqi Prospect, an organization in Britain. There is usually some insight into what is happening in Iraq from the Iraqi perspective that makes it worthwhile to digest. Along with Hammorabi and Healing Iraq, I get a picture of the goings on.

Today’s message is Turning the Muqtada Crisis into a Milestone for Iraqi Sovereignty by Sama Hadad in London and Adil Shalan in Baghdad, has take on Muqtada:

Before the establishment of the Iraqi Governing Council he behaved himself very well, and appeared on Al-Jazeera in May speaking positively of the US presence. However, this affirmative attitude soon changed, when he was not included in the 25-member Governing Council. Feeling marginalised, he has grown progressively more hostile and critical of the US-led Coalition and Governing Council.

al-Sadr is whining that he is being ignored. Both Sam and Zeyad agree. Muqtada feels he deserves a position of authority because his father and grandfather were both prominent religious men in Iraq prior to being murdered. His grandfather, in particular, was quite the leader, and we can only wish Muqtada had turned out the same. Grandfather advocated a democratic form of Islam.

There will be pressure from many groups to give the child what he wants so he’ll stop his temper tantrum. Hada and Shalan support that. I don’t.

Americans are often criticized for wanting things to happen too quickly. Pundits in the Old World think we rush things. That’s probably true. This time, when the agenda suits them, the same people want us to rush when it better serves Iraq to go more slowly. Putting Muqtada or one of his representatives on the Governing Council to end the needless violence does nothing but ensure more needless violence the next time things don’t go his way. US troops aren’t responsible for the fighting, Muqtada is.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress